Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

AleksS

(1,724 posts)

4. Yes, wasn't that just the "emergency" part of the appeal?

Reply to WillyT (Original post)

Thu May 8, 2014, 04:19 PM

May 2014

Yes, wasn't that just the "emergency" part of the appeal? (I thought the defendants filed an emergency appeal specifically to stop the return-and-destroy portion of Randa's ruling, and are filing a "normal" appeal to deal with the rest?)

Won't the panel consider the entire appeal in a less hasty fashion?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scott Walker's John Doe Case Stopped AGAIN !!! - At Least They Can't Destroy The Evidence... I Think [View all] WillyT May 2014 OP

HALF-LOAF GeorgeGist May 2014 #1

they dont have to destroy the evidence leftyohiolib May 2014 #2

The 7th Circuit will have another crack at this ruling Gothmog May 2014 #3

Yes, wasn't that just the "emergency" part of the appeal? AleksS May 2014 #4

If the John Doe innvestigation was started nykym May 2014 #5