Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
69. Thanks for the kind words and for the response.
Fri May 9, 2014, 06:57 AM
May 2014

I recall being outrageously excited in 2008 when Barack Obama received campaign donations from over 2 million individual donors. I speculated, at the time, that the internet had the capacity to restore democracy to the people by giving us the opportunity to, quite literally, buy politicians like our oligarchs have always done. I thought (as did many others) that We, the People had finally purchased a President. Turns out this prediction was wrong and that keeping Wall Street happy remains the primary concern of the leaders of both our major political parties.

As for individual politicians, in this political climate I want to give the benefit of the doubt to anyone who runs for office with a (D) after their name. Selecting that (D) means weak party support, media hostility, and less campaign cash than one would get if one selected the (R) instead. What cynic would make that choice? I think the cynics are more likely to choose the (R) because that is the easy path to money and power. The (D) path is much more treacherous these days. For this reason, I think most of our politicians are good, reasonable people who, once they understand the system, have to make some very hard choices, and many of those choices are contrary to the best interests of the people. The money that drives the system makes this so.

I think, as you speculate, that there are national policies that Presidents are reticent to change, but only out of fear of reprisal from huge, powerful, and wealthy interests in this country that have the power to destroy a President and his administration. Look at how the health insurance/hospital/pharmaceutical interests crushed Clinton for merely suggesting reform of their profitable (but evil) practices. Just imagine a President who messed with big oil. Big oil could easily crush that administration by jacking up the price of gas (which, by the way, is how most people gauge the health of the nation). There are some interests that it is simply unwise to fight. Presidents who do so jeopardize everything else that they want to accomplish while in office.

So, it's very complicated, but thanks for the response and for this interesting discussion.

-Laelth

We have this thing called "Primaries" VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #1
We know unconstitutionally required ID's will make the difference this november randys1 May 2014 #2
Hmm ... Laelth May 2014 #3
99% don't get out and get OTHER people to vote WITH Them VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #4
Then get out in the real world and do something other than admonish those that WILL vote Dragonfli May 2014 #48
Are you accusing me....because I did door to door last election....so VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #49
You should be doing it now if GOTV were as important to you as you claim Dragonfli May 2014 #50
Already making plans to travel to another state to do exactly that.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #51
Stop making "plans", get out the vote or STFU Dragonfli May 2014 #58
I don't JUST make plans.....I carry them out.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #60
You are the one constantly yelling at DUers to get out and vote, not me Dragonfli May 2014 #61
I already told you....I do... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #63
If they were more than posers looking for a pat on the back here Dragonfli May 2014 #47
LOL. Good post. Thanks. n/t Laelth May 2014 #52
May not need them if Joe Biden decides to run? hughee99 May 2014 #32
VP gets poll position.... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #40
Is there any poll which lists Biden as the favorite in a Democratic primary? hughee99 May 2014 #42
What do YOU think happens it Biden decides to run even with Hillary in? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #43
If Biden gets in while Clinton is in, we're still going to need a primary. hughee99 May 2014 #44
Not messy at all...unusually UNMESSY in fact.....UNLESS Joe Biden decides to run... VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #46
I occasionally see these posts that say 'we don't need a primary' when an incumbent is running Bluenorthwest May 2014 #38
and I didn't say we didn't need it....do you know the history of being Vice President VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #41
Obama had his own fundraising behemoth a year before Kerry's endorsement frazzled May 2014 #5
I suspect Kerry threw his weight behind Obama long before January 10, 2008. Laelth May 2014 #7
"Supposing" is mere conjecture frazzled May 2014 #14
I mentioned in the OP that Obama improved upon Kerry's machine. Laelth May 2014 #22
Very true davidpdx May 2014 #10
Great post, Laelth! Octafish May 2014 #6
Thanks for the response and for the kind words. n/t Laelth May 2014 #37
Your problem is that Obama's machine no longer exists. It was a one time thing, successful but... CK_John May 2014 #8
Interesting response. Thanks. Laelth May 2014 #15
Thanks for this thread NV Whino May 2014 #9
If Hillary wants to run (and Joe Biden does not), I agree. Laelth May 2014 #55
Excellent essay Le Taz Hot May 2014 #11
Obama will back either Clinton or Biden and that has nothing to do with "corporatism" stevenleser May 2014 #19
"a serious stab in the back" Oh well we're used to that. L0oniX May 2014 #25
Ultimately, I agree. Laelth May 2014 #26
I have to admit I'm interested in Warren davidpdx May 2014 #12
I linked to Amazon in the OP. Laelth May 2014 #28
For overseas davidpdx May 2014 #65
Very cool. Thanks. n/t Laelth May 2014 #66
The voters will choose. That's why there are primary elections. MineralMan May 2014 #13
Mineral Man, I have to admit ... Laelth May 2014 #16
Idealism only dies when people stop striving for the ideal. MineralMan May 2014 #17
My idealism died many years ago and has been replaced by reality and sarcasm Exposethefrauds May 2014 #24
If you are a compelling candidate, you can raise enough money to compete in the first 2-3 contests stevenleser May 2014 #18
Perhaps, but ... Laelth May 2014 #56
The 1% will give us our "choices" LittleBlue May 2014 #20
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #21
Kick this sad, but true thread. Scuba May 2014 #23
Thanks, Scuba. Laelth May 2014 #70
Wall Street and the upper crust. SamKnause May 2014 #27
President Obama has NEVER chosen or appointed someone from the Progressive Wing of the Party... bvar22 May 2014 #29
In all fairness ... Laelth May 2014 #30
...and there was Hilda Solis, appointed as Labor Srcretary in his frist administration, bvar22 May 2014 #34
Cabinet appointments matter a great deal. Laelth May 2014 #54
The money already has. n/t Orsino May 2014 #31
i didn't think my vote mattered, anyway. Sheri May 2014 #33
I sincerely hope you're not talking about my poll Fearless May 2014 #35
No. I wasn't. Laelth May 2014 #53
Interesting post...but, I'd say it isn't Barack Obama who will decide... KoKo May 2014 #36
Excellent points, Laelth. My only addition to your post is to ask since we now KNOW that money sabrina 1 May 2014 #39
Thanks for the kind words and for the response. Laelth May 2014 #69
Ahhh so refreshing to see someone who thinks we Exposethefrauds May 2014 #45
Recommend KoKo May 2014 #57
Thanks. n/t Laelth May 2014 #71
K & R !!! WillyT May 2014 #59
Bankers and Wall Street alarimer May 2014 #62
Did it ever occur to any of you Warren supporters that maybe Hillary is the one Democrat Beacool May 2014 #64
I don't think there'd be any difference between a President H. Clinton ecstatic May 2014 #67
I suspect their cabinets would be very different. Laelth May 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who will choose our 2016 ...»Reply #69