Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

heh grasswire May 2014 #1
Probably afraid of getting slammed by 'company men' Warpy May 2014 #2
Probably because Cheney has the goods on everyone ... aggiesal May 2014 #7
Nancy Pelosi took impeachment off the table because... JohnnyRingo May 2014 #9
Instead of grabbing the wheel ... aggiesal May 2014 #11
Dems lost 2010. nt RandiFan1290 May 2014 #16
Yeah, 2010 was a big-time disaster Art_from_Ark May 2014 #17
You're right... I was thinking of '06 and '08 JohnnyRingo May 2014 #18
Cheney, Addison and Gonzales grasswire May 2014 #10
I remember having Ashcroft shoot up above them in my estimation Warpy May 2014 #21
Empty Suit is selected to be an Empty Suit struggle4progress May 2014 #14
Longish thread here: The Velveteen Ocelot May 2014 #3
Thank You... Searched... But Did Not Find... WillyT May 2014 #4
Thanks. nt bananas May 2014 #5
Well maybe too much for some to revisit- watching all those faces that make me sick upon sight again lunasun May 2014 #6
that was terrific grasswire May 2014 #8
Missed it because I had to work neverforget May 2014 #12
There were at least three threads devoted to it: struggle4progress May 2014 #13
The topic is suddenly not very contentious. ronnie624 May 2014 #19
I don't remember ever seeing many "defenders of the national security/surveillance state" here struggle4progress May 2014 #20
Snowden/Greenwald are the surrogates, in my opinion, ronnie624 May 2014 #22
Frontline has done stories on such matters, before Snowden, such as struggle4progress May 2014 #23
Snowden and Greenwald have ignited a prominent global debate on the issue. ronnie624 May 2014 #25
The fallacy being there are no "defenders of the surveillance state" that BushCo set up. tridim May 2014 #26
The national security state is a constant. ronnie624 May 2014 #29
Devastating For Both Bush And Obama cantbeserious May 2014 #15
because no one wanted to admit that Obama is just as in on it TorchTheWitch May 2014 #24
Will be interesting to see what "Part 2" reveals next week. KoKo May 2014 #27
I wouldn't have cared if it was four hours TorchTheWitch May 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»First... Interesting That...»Reply #16