General Discussion

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

22. Unless there's evidence of him conspiring

Reply to AnalystInParadise (Reply #20)

Wed May 21, 2014, 08:07 PM

May 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

83 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Secretary Shinseki MUST GO!!!! [View all] AnalystInParadise May 2014 OP

Are you quite sure your rage is properly focused? Xipe Totec May 2014 #1

Secretary Shinseki AnalystInParadise May 2014 #3

No, they don't. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #13

Singlehandedly? I think there were a lot of actors Xipe Totec May 2014 #33

Shinseki is a start AnalystInParadise May 2014 #36

Prosecution is the job of the Justice Dept. Xipe Totec May 2014 #43

Gladly AnalystInParadise May 2014 #49

I look forward to it. Xipe Totec May 2014 #83

The President should ProSense May 2014 #2

I don't care about the damn politics AnalystInParadise May 2014 #4

Yes, you do. ProSense May 2014 #8

What a surprise AnalystInParadise May 2014 #14

Why don't you leave your condescending tone JaneyVee May 2014 #18

you do realize that Shinseki is part of the Obama administration ? JI7 May 2014 #19

Yep AnalystInParadise May 2014 #21

You are not even making sense at this point. Raine1967 May 2014 #28

It is decades overdue AnalystInParadise May 2014 #37

I call bullpucky. Raine1967 May 2014 #61

Yeah I was one of those guys in that war AnalystInParadise May 2014 #67

Well, ProSense May 2014 #23

This sounds too much like what some people said after 9/11--that we needed to attack tblue37 May 2014 #62

Back during the Bush years, the husband of a friend of mine worked on the Skidmore May 2014 #29

^^^ This right here. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #32

I dare BOG AnalystInParadise May 2014 #5

You dare "BOG"? ProSense May 2014 #10

Ayup. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #12

No I am Pro-Obama AnalystInParadise May 2014 #16

You really have a weird way of showing it. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #26

I know AnalystInParadise May 2014 #30

Yes, this entire thread is incredibly odd. MohRokTah May 2014 #31

Not odd AnalystInParadise May 2014 #34

Incredibly odd... eom MohRokTah May 2014 #35

Yes you are and transparent AnalystInParadise May 2014 #38

I disagree, hold the actual people accountable JaneyVee May 2014 #11

So Shinseki is blameless AnalystInParadise May 2014 #20

Unless there's evidence of him conspiring JaneyVee May 2014 #22

That's your opinion and you're entitlted to it. MohRokTah May 2014 #6

So two sitting Congressmen are wrong? AnalystInParadise May 2014 #7

Generally speaking, 435 sitting members of Congress are wrong. MohRokTah May 2014 #9

yes, they are probably wrong, they certainly are wrong in their opposition to gay rights JI7 May 2014 #17

Why would you think that being a "sitting congressman" indicates more knowledge or honesty tblue37 May 2014 #63

Access to more information AnalystInParadise May 2014 #73

But sitting congressmen also have very powerful incentives to *ignore* facts tblue37 May 2014 #75

2 blue dogs, Scott voted in support of a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage JI7 May 2014 #15

And SSM AnalystInParadise May 2014 #40

it's politics, they are playing for a certain crowd in both cases JI7 May 2014 #41

Which crowd AnalystInParadise May 2014 #46

conservative leanign crowd, he is a member of the Blue Dog caucus also JI7 May 2014 #50

So still a Democrat? AnalystInParadise May 2014 #68

it's not a smear, it's a fact, you smear shinseki with this type of thread JI7 May 2014 #74

Anyone at the VA aware of this scandal who stayed silent should be fired. Throd May 2014 #24

Thank you AnalystInParadise May 2014 #27

Are you assuming that Shinseki knew? Raine1967 May 2014 #39

I don't know AnalystInParadise May 2014 #44

Fix another word. Your autocorrect changed "prefer" to "piercer." tblue37 May 2014 #66

Thank you again! Raine1967 May 2014 #69

I just saw a subject line of a post by 1StrongBlackMan in which tblue37 May 2014 #72

The real question is AnalystInParadise May 2014 #25

Seriously, if you give a crap the way you say you do in you OP, I'd suggest this: Raine1967 May 2014 #42

It isn't about politics AnalystInParadise May 2014 #45

Assuming how they would respond is projection. You set up a straw man and are arguing it. Raine1967 May 2014 #48

Repeating myself: I was outraged when Walter Reed was allowed to rot, and I'm outraged now Algernon Moncrieff May 2014 #47

Yep AnalystInParadise May 2014 #52

I respectfully disagree, but I understand your frustration. politicat May 2014 #51

Thank you AnalystInParadise May 2014 #54

This message was self-deleted by its author AnalystInParadise May 2014 #55

Excellent post. Thank you for sharing your real knowledge on this subject. kwassa May 2014 #76

I'm a disabled veteran CatWoman May 2014 #53

I'm not trying to pick a fight. I just have some questions Algernon Moncrieff May 2014 #60

I think what was going on was a "local" problem CatWoman May 2014 #77

Localized to veterans? Yep..... AnalystInParadise May 2014 #79

I think the question is about executive practice and the desire for efficiency goals applegrove May 2014 #56

I am ok with leaving him in place for now AnalystInParadise May 2014 #57

I agree. applegrove May 2014 #58

Wow. Iggo May 2014 #78

ty nlab4444 May 2014 #59

How about the 41 GOP Senators that voted against Veteran's Benefits? FSogol May 2014 #64

If we can replace them all in elections AnalystInParadise May 2014 #71

As I have posted elsewhere... sendero May 2014 #65

Who says I am not angry at Congress? AnalystInParadise May 2014 #70

Shinseki... sendero May 2014 #81

I'd like to see a lot of people fired customerserviceguy May 2014 #80

I applaud the President for calling for a thorough investigation. He will roll any mfcorey1 May 2014 #82