Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Secretary Shinseki MUST GO!!!! [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)23. Well,
What a surprise
Here you are to protect the "precious".
I am not talking about PBO a man that I love and respect, his Secretary must go. This is just beginning, more Congressmen will denounce the Sec. as more comes out. Hopefully PBO will do the honorable thing and ask for him to resign.
Here you are to protect the "precious".
I am not talking about PBO a man that I love and respect, his Secretary must go. This is just beginning, more Congressmen will denounce the Sec. as more comes out. Hopefully PBO will do the honorable thing and ask for him to resign.
...that makes no sense. I mean, you claimed it wasn't about "politics." Then you issued a "dare" to "BOG."
Now, here you are talking about how you "love and respect" Obama, but referring to disagreement about firing the VA Sec as "protect the 'precious'" (whatever the hell that means).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This sounds too much like what some people said after 9/11--that we needed to attack
tblue37
May 2014
#62
yes, they are probably wrong, they certainly are wrong in their opposition to gay rights
JI7
May 2014
#17
Why would you think that being a "sitting congressman" indicates more knowledge or honesty
tblue37
May 2014
#63
2 blue dogs, Scott voted in support of a constitutional amendment to ban same sex marriage
JI7
May 2014
#15
Seriously, if you give a crap the way you say you do in you OP, I'd suggest this:
Raine1967
May 2014
#42
Assuming how they would respond is projection. You set up a straw man and are arguing it.
Raine1967
May 2014
#48
Repeating myself: I was outraged when Walter Reed was allowed to rot, and I'm outraged now
Algernon Moncrieff
May 2014
#47
I think the question is about executive practice and the desire for efficiency goals
applegrove
May 2014
#56
I applaud the President for calling for a thorough investigation. He will roll any
mfcorey1
May 2014
#82