Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

imanamerican63

(16,172 posts) Sun Feb 14, 2021, 03:22 PM Feb 2021

So, I tell 20 people to rob a bank? [View all]

They get riled up and they do it but they kill someone along the way? 43 jurors would acquit me even if those 43 jurors where in the bank at the time of of the robbery? I think the law would not be on my side?

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, I tell 20 people to rob a bank? [View all] imanamerican63 Feb 2021 OP

More like tell the 20 people again and again that the bank stole their money Shermann Feb 2021 #1

Sorry, but any investigation will delay the Mayor's agenda! n/t servermsh Feb 2021 #2

This. They should not have cut a deal and should have called witnesses. CentralMass Feb 2021 #3

And you believe that witnesses would have secured even ONE more Repub vote? 11 Bravo Feb 2021 #5

No, I belive it would have exposed the gravity of the January 6th in greater detail and potentially CentralMass Feb 2021 #6

I thought that had been made manifestly clear, but 43 Senators were so cowed or sycophantic ... 11 Bravo Feb 2021 #7

I think the deal was to save them from more embarrassment and exposure of their CentralMass Feb 2021 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author 11 Bravo Feb 2021 #8

You could also earn points with the jury if you tell them bank employees were among the robbers. Initech Feb 2021 #4

This is the way our system works. radius777 Feb 2021 #9