Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
4. We need a lot more data to determine that one way or another.
Thu May 29, 2014, 07:48 PM
May 2014

You mention satellites, but do we know whether the determination was made by satellite?

It is not as simple as "America has satellites so we know everything that is going on everywhere!!!!111!11!"

Russia has 6.5 million square miles of territory. The Russia-Ukraine border is 1400 miles long. The unfortunate truth about using any camera to perform surveillance is, the more you zoom in to get details in a photo, the less total area that photo covers.

Satellite surveillance still involves a lot of tasking requests to move around satellites to get pictures of different parts of the globe. Even if we assume that a satellite has been tasked to be in geosynchronous orbit right above Ukraine to see what's going on there. There is a lot of territory to cover.

Intelligence estimates are almost always that. Estimates. "We think there is a 60% chance that..." or there is a high likelihood of X or a low likelihood of Y. Here is an example http://www.governmentattic.org/5docs/NIE-2006-02R.pdf

Just like polls, there is always a percentage chance of error.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN: U.S. Officials Confi...»Reply #4