Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Study: Slut-shaming has little to do with sex; more to do with social class among women [View all]
A new study of college women and their attitudes about so-called sluttiness found that slut-shaming calling out a woman for her supposedly promiscuous sexual behavior actually had more to do with a womans social class than it did with sexual activity.
Sociologists from the University of Michigan and the University of California at Merced occupied a dorm room in a large Midwestern university, regularly interacting with and interviewing 53 women about their attitudes on school, friends, partying and sexuality from the time they moved in as freshman and following up for the next five years.
The researchers discovered that definitions of "slutty" behavior and the act of slut-shaming was largely determined along class lines rather than based on actual sexual behavior. What's more, they found the more affluent women were able to engage in more sexual experimentation without being slut-shamed, while the less-affluent women were ridiculed as sluts for being trashy or not classy, even though they engaged in less sexual behavior.
"Viewing women only as victims of men's sexual dominance fails to hold women accountable for the roles they play in reproducing social inequalities," Elizabeth Armstrong, a sociology and organizational studies professor at the University of Michigan, said in a release. "By engaging in 'slut-shaming' the practice of maligning women for presumed sexual activity women at the top create more space for their own sexual experimentation, at the cost of women at the bottom of social hierarchies."
Sociologists from the University of Michigan and the University of California at Merced occupied a dorm room in a large Midwestern university, regularly interacting with and interviewing 53 women about their attitudes on school, friends, partying and sexuality from the time they moved in as freshman and following up for the next five years.
The researchers discovered that definitions of "slutty" behavior and the act of slut-shaming was largely determined along class lines rather than based on actual sexual behavior. What's more, they found the more affluent women were able to engage in more sexual experimentation without being slut-shamed, while the less-affluent women were ridiculed as sluts for being trashy or not classy, even though they engaged in less sexual behavior.
"Viewing women only as victims of men's sexual dominance fails to hold women accountable for the roles they play in reproducing social inequalities," Elizabeth Armstrong, a sociology and organizational studies professor at the University of Michigan, said in a release. "By engaging in 'slut-shaming' the practice of maligning women for presumed sexual activity women at the top create more space for their own sexual experimentation, at the cost of women at the bottom of social hierarchies."
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/5/29/slut-shaming-study.html
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study: Slut-shaming has little to do with sex; more to do with social class among women [View all]
davidn3600
May 2014
OP
If book reviews were as informative as the study, there would be no need to publish the paper.
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#22
We need to have access to the paper before making meaningful conclusions.
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#15