Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's Keep Score Here... Grasswire Just Got A Second Strike... [View all]WillyT
(72,631 posts)56. I've Always Wondered About The Encyclopedic Knowledge Of Some Here On RW Websites...
I can name a few sites... yet it seems that there are those here that have many in mind.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Absolutely. I've called for that before. It could cut down on the abuses.
Comrade Grumpy
Jun 2014
#19
Alerter? Why not the jury as well? Transparency and innominate juries...oxymoron anyone?
flvegan
Jun 2014
#92
And I Hate That... As A Poster In One Or Two Threads About This Subject Said...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#116
The "no whining on DU" provision of the SoP really jumps out for you, doesn't it?
pacalo
Jun 2014
#88
GD hosts aren't "wanting people to use the alert"; they're there because alerts are inevitable.
pacalo
Jun 2014
#108
the hosts do not all agree on woo, or RWNJ sourcing either. there are a few holdouts that make
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#126
There's almost always host popping up to "leave" since a few believe one leave means
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#124
So.. If A Right-Wing Website Said The GW Was A Failure... We Wouldn't Post It Here ???
WillyT
Jun 2014
#7
Or it may have never been hidden, losing 3-4, or 2-5, you make my point, being human; juries
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#130
He also set up the Discussionist site -- which seems to really get under your skin.
pacalo
Jun 2014
#90
Actions speak louder than disingenuous backtracking. I've seen a number of gripes about it from you.
pacalo
Jun 2014
#111
Ah yes. Wouldnt you like it if DU became the BOG? Smite anyone that dares speak out
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#87
Desperation can perform miracles of getting around obstacles. Don't underestimate.
pacalo
Jun 2014
#63
I've Always Wondered About The Encyclopedic Knowledge Of Some Here On RW Websites...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#56
You didn't see the subtitle under the Newsbusters Banner? Exposing Liberal Bias? C'mon now....
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#44
well, most people here post from sources they are familiar with- to avoid this sort of RWNJ crap
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#60
That was my first instinct, too -- it can't be denied that the two are married. Good gawd.
pacalo
Jun 2014
#53
Soon that small minority is all that will be left here, then they will be the majority.
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#46
Locking. Complaining about jury decisions violates the GD Statement of Purpose.
ucrdem
Jun 2014
#132