Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]OverseaVisitor
(296 posts)31. NOPE
Low turnout indicate the people total disgust with the choice they have.
And yes it can happen to the dem too.
Likely the politician will mess it all up again.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I believe that some of that happened and is what is responsible for the huge margin of the win. But
kelliekat44
Jun 2014
#34
Nope...Karl Rove's software never take into consideration return ratfucking!
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#5
Apparently turn out was horrendously low... sounds like polls didn't take in to account....
hlthe2b
Jun 2014
#16
Interesting as I have read at least three articles citing low turn out... I'll have to go find links
hlthe2b
Jun 2014
#23
And the conclusion: "Cantor's loss seems to be much more the result of weak support among
FSogol
Jun 2014
#32
Our Supt of Public Education won based in large part to social media in 2012.
LiberalFighter
Jun 2014
#30