Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When you hide nadinbrzezinski, DU has officially lost it ... [View all]IronGate
(2,186 posts)34. What? When did this happen?
And why would that post be hidden?
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, I'd say hiding my post for using the word 'ratfucker' because it is supposedly
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#10
So she is somehow sacrosanct? DU officially 'lost it' when it ran Nance Greggs off.
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#5
I don't understand the complaining about her being banned. She caused it. No one else. n-t
Logical
Jun 2014
#9
Many jurys are wrong. It is just the way it goes. But no one whines about it. n-t
Logical
Jun 2014
#24
I don't think 4 jurors and 1 alerter is enough of a sample to say "DU has officially lost it"
arcane1
Jun 2014
#70
who cares ? people get bad hides all the time and they don't start multiple threads about it
JI7
Jun 2014
#26
the problem has already existed in other cases but people didn't start multiple threads over it
JI7
Jun 2014
#38
so what ? others have gotten hides for stupid shit also, and she had many other hides, it wasn't
JI7
Jun 2014
#48
"she called no one a Ahole or said anything about another DUers credentials being fake"
FSogol
Jun 2014
#77