Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When you hide nadinbrzezinski, DU has officially lost it ... [View all]bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)80. Keep it up LOL
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, I'd say hiding my post for using the word 'ratfucker' because it is supposedly
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#10
So she is somehow sacrosanct? DU officially 'lost it' when it ran Nance Greggs off.
KittyWampus
Jun 2014
#5
I don't understand the complaining about her being banned. She caused it. No one else. n-t
Logical
Jun 2014
#9
Many jurys are wrong. It is just the way it goes. But no one whines about it. n-t
Logical
Jun 2014
#24
I don't think 4 jurors and 1 alerter is enough of a sample to say "DU has officially lost it"
arcane1
Jun 2014
#70
who cares ? people get bad hides all the time and they don't start multiple threads about it
JI7
Jun 2014
#26
the problem has already existed in other cases but people didn't start multiple threads over it
JI7
Jun 2014
#38
so what ? others have gotten hides for stupid shit also, and she had many other hides, it wasn't
JI7
Jun 2014
#48
"she called no one a Ahole or said anything about another DUers credentials being fake"
FSogol
Jun 2014
#77