Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pamela

(3,481 posts)

10. I definitely think they should!

Reply to frazzled (Reply #1)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 01:38 PM

Jul 2014

For all the reasons you stated and more! there are medical conditions treated with contraceptives that also cost way more to treat if contraceptives can't be used. For example, if Endometriosis isn't treated with oral contraceptives the insurance companies will eventually be paying for laparoscopic surgery, infertility treatment, etc.

I think insurance companies would be well within their rights to charge more for any policy that doesn't include contraceptive coverage.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

After Hobby Lobby, These 82 Corporations Could Drop Birth Control Coverage - DailyBeast [View all] WillyT Jul 2014 OP

How about getting insurers to charge MORE for no-contraceptive policies? frazzled Jul 2014 #1

I definitely think they should! pamela Jul 2014 #10

I will personally boycott everyone of these corporations. Agnosticsherbet Jul 2014 #2

And it's just not Catholics pushing for this either; Southern Baptists are pushing this hard, too: Lars39 Jul 2014 #3

Of course they are. They hate women too. nt redqueen Jul 2014 #4

Ugh. Birth control is used for more than preventing pregnancy. Its also got medical uses riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #5

Women who have been on the Pill lowered their chances of getting ovarian cancer IggleDoer Jul 2014 #9

And this is just the beginning...... thank you.We have to take away women's health as a wedge issue bettyellen Jul 2014 #6

Now, they only have to hire men, because "women" (ugh) won't want to work there. valerief Jul 2014 #7

How about the Obama Admin revoking their EEOC status. sybylla Jul 2014 #8

K&R! countryjake Jul 2014 #11