General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Do you consider this photo anti-Semitic? [View all]
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Violet_Crumble (a host of the General Discussion forum).
Photo is at: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5199752
I absolutely DESPISE Henry Kissinger, but c'mon, if the photo in the link above has his nose reshapen like that (vs. an actual photo of him), you can't say that photo doesn't have some dog-whistle anti-Semitic overtones to it. I've seen that image on all sorts of conspiracy (thus it follows anti-Semitic) websites.
Yet a jury UNANIMOUSLY voted to leave it alone. You won't believe the types of comments posted there. Even though I provided links in my alert comments to conspiracy sites that had the image (which I shall not repost here) and links to sites explaining the anti-Semitic trope of the "hooked nose".
Explanation: Sorry, war criminal is a war criminal. This is not anti-semitic, it's anti-kissinger.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Someone dares to speak their mind against GMOs and this is what you resort to, accusations of antisemitism? This is a discussion forum, people are allowed to disagree and have different opinions. I don't give a damn one way or the other, but the fact that you feel the need to shut this person up so badly with wild accusations speaks volumes. Leave.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The entire thread is deliberately insulting so...meh.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Meh!
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Meh.
So 3 "meh" comments, 2 "no explanations given", and the typical "this is just an opinion" comment, in a jury pool that won't enforce DU ToS (where the "no bigoted hate speech" section explicitly lists claiming "nefarious influence by Jews" as an example). Amazing.