General Discussion

6000eliot

(5,643 posts)

33. She's taking away a right-wing talking point.

Reply to Segami (Original post)

Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:25 AM

Jul 2014

Very skillfully, I might add.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

92 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Segami Jul 2014 OP

That could be good or bad. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #1

I've not seen that Hillary supports much of the first paragraph pipoman Jul 2014 #4

Well, since Obama started negotiations from the middle, I guess that means Hillary ... Scuba Jul 2014 #2

Really, considering all the times they've reached out to us. Octafish Jul 2014 #3

LMFAO +1 L0oniX Jul 2014 #48

When Obama took office he bent over backward to woo the fucking republicans liberal N proud Jul 2014 #5

+1 Segami Jul 2014 #6

pfffttt! Stellar Jul 2014 #21

Trying to figure out ways to pay the mortagageS on her houseS...y'know...being so poor and all that. truebrit71 Jul 2014 #24

Christ, Obama bent so far backward for republicans, I thought he had switched parties. And RKP5637 Jul 2014 #32

but just a little harder and we'll make some real progress! reddread Jul 2014 #85

In a world that made sense, this would foreclose her candidacy. morningfog Jul 2014 #7

In a world that made sense R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2014 #78

Woo... pipoman Jul 2014 #8

We should not be negotiating with terrorists Takket Jul 2014 #9

Personally, I believe that Obama "reached out" to Republicans more than he should have. nt ladjf Jul 2014 #10

"...In talking up her husband's ability to work with Republicans,.. Segami Jul 2014 #11

who is she trying to woo making statements like this ? Duppers Jul 2014 #74

Hillary Robbins Jul 2014 #12

Read the article. Doesn't seem to say what you are promoting from it. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #29

Huh? ProfessorGAC Jul 2014 #46

Makes perfect sense to anyone who has followed Hillary for a while. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #49

I Read The Article Too ProfessorGAC Jul 2014 #73

Trimming entitlements and a consensus on income inequality. Ichingcarpenter Jul 2014 #13

Cutting back on "future entitlements" means no more wars. Think that will happen? L0oniX Jul 2014 #43

Right... nt Mnemosyne Jul 2014 #14

Parsing her every freaking word and sentence for "meaning"........it is a sickness,,,,, Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #15

Well, if she would speak like a human instead of a Cautiobn Machine that wouldn;t be necessary Armstead Jul 2014 #20

Every human has the same habit, words and sentences always can be variously interpreted. Always. Fred Sanders Jul 2014 #23

True, but some more than others Armstead Jul 2014 #31

not every person has studied at Bill Clinton's dojo of triangulation, however. frylock Jul 2014 #89

You mean like Bill Clinton did with the word "is"? L0oniX Jul 2014 #44

Yes, embrace a system based on diametric opposition whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #16

Yes ...let's just have one party. The Center Party. L0oniX Jul 2014 #34

No, just the left party :) whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #55

Had enough centrists yet? marmar Jul 2014 #17

I'm still tryig to forgive Bill Clinton for racist remarks in 2008. Stellar Jul 2014 #18

No one wins the presidency by running as a clone of the current President. conservaphobe Jul 2014 #19

Why not go more progressive instead of doubling down with the right? whatchamacallit Jul 2014 #22

Did you miss the part in the thread that said this was about Hilary Clinton? truebrit71 Jul 2014 #26

Nothing about this piece has anything to do with "doubling down with the right". NCTraveler Jul 2014 #27

This message was self-deleted by its author conservaphobe Jul 2014 #28

Political common sense. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #25

In other words, be mushy against an unyielding opponent instead of actually chllenging them Armstead Jul 2014 #38

"In other words, be mushy against an unyielding opponent instead of actually chllenging them" NCTraveler Jul 2014 #84

Who is winning? Armstead Jul 2014 #86

This is based off of ideology. When one person wins, another loses, most don't care. NCTraveler Jul 2014 #88

I don't know how that translates to: conservaphobe Jul 2014 #40

It doesn't. Plus it's the WSJ, which is being overlooked in this thread. Demit Jul 2014 #54

"Political common sense" also says that supply-side economics works like a charm Scootaloo Jul 2014 #83

Yes ...Dinos should join with Rinos and create their own party. The Center Party. L0oniX Jul 2014 #30

Or We can call it 'The Goldman Sachs Party' Ichingcarpenter Jul 2014 #41

The Center Party makes it more anon. Anyone can payola to it. L0oniX Jul 2014 #45

Since congress is grid locked do you suppose.......... nolabels Jul 2014 #58

She's taking away a right-wing talking point. 6000eliot Jul 2014 #33

and there are people here who want to vote for this dumb ass? bowens43 Jul 2014 #35

oh,dear lord...People are "really, really nervous" about their future, antigop Jul 2014 #36

So she reaffirms support for more foreign workers at the expense of unemployed Americans? Generic Other Jul 2014 #59

How H-1B Visas Are Screwing Tech Workers antigop Jul 2014 #63

Hillary be cautious. If you give a Republican an inch they will take a yard. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #37

They will "they will take a yard" and tell everyone to "get off my lawn". L0oniX Jul 2014 #47

The games people play... Faux pas Jul 2014 #39

There she is in the photo sitting next to 9ui11iani corkhead Jul 2014 #42

Now we can see why her poll numbers are dropping Larkspur Jul 2014 #50

The stoopid, it burns Kelvin Mace Jul 2014 #51

Perhaps, she can team up with the Repubs and vote for another war. Broward Jul 2014 #52

She's never been my primary choice ever any way. Xyzse Jul 2014 #53

"more assertive stance toward global crises" = More War! Xithras Jul 2014 #56

It's Bill speaking -- since he is the Shadow Presidential Candidate... KoKo Jul 2014 #57

Great now Hillary is tearing down Obama instead of helping Democrats get elected this year awake Jul 2014 #60

If by woo they mean hootinholler Jul 2014 #61

The headline is misleading. Nowhere does she actually say this in the article. Metric System Jul 2014 #62

wall street journal - more murdoch bullshit rurallib Jul 2014 #64

the WSJ is imagining the part about the wooing Enrique Jul 2014 #65

Maybe she should run as a Republican and promise to "reach out" to Democrats. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #66

At her hart she is still the board member of Wall mart awake Jul 2014 #69

Hillary has a short memory. Frustratedlady Jul 2014 #67

The article doesn't even quote her. It's BS speculation from the WSJ. Metric System Jul 2014 #71

Looks more like okay lets creates news... Historic NY Jul 2014 #68

Why reach out to a Republican party that's in the toilet? Oilwellian Jul 2014 #70

The more she says, the more queasy I get. Union Scribe Jul 2014 #72

Hillary Clinton Harmony Blue Jul 2014 #75

Can you give an example of her good strategy working in the past awake Jul 2014 #77

you forgot the tag reddread Jul 2014 #87

This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Jul 2014 #76

you're being played bigtree Jul 2014 #79

Or unless you vote for a true liberal in economics and representation, mmonk Jul 2014 #80

Make sure you read to the bottom of the WSJ article.... DonViejo Jul 2014 #81

Hillary is not my first choice, and crap like this... abakan Jul 2014 #82

Nonsense. Orsino Jul 2014 #90

This attitude is why our country is headed down the toilet DJ13 Jul 2014 #91

I have a firm policy. I never pay any attention to anything the WSJ spews. retread Jul 2014 #92