General Discussion

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)

36. From an article I wrote some years ago,

Sun Jul 13, 2014, 02:19 PM

Jul 2014

That was published by ACLU award winning "The Coastal Post" (And please note the Newsweek citation! this is not my imagination!)

Also some of those who have investigated HAARP are also concerned about other applications employing microwave technology that can be used as "mind-control" weapons over civilians. In recent months, Newsweek detailed how a vending machine already exists that can send out a subliminal "audio" signal to whatever human being may be walking by it, with the suggestion that "You are thirsty now. Wouldn't you like a soda." And as this suggestion exists below the normal conscious sensory apparatus of a human, it has an extremely powerful effect. The entire experience takes place through beaming microwave energy at the hapless human.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Senate Is Giving More Power To The NSA, In Secret. Everyone Should Fight It. - Guardian [View all] WillyT Jul 2014 OP

What I find so absolutely bizarre, is if some are up to something, they probably aren't going to RKP5637 Jul 2014 #1

And again: if you have nothing to hide, MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #2

If they could achieve it, I think they would also opt for mass mind control. Technology is RKP5637 Jul 2014 #3

They are getting as close to it as they can. woo me with science Jul 2014 #5

Thanks for posting this! I often wonder how many really get how manipulated and controlled they RKP5637 Jul 2014 #7

It's interesting that Cass Sunstein seems to be... PosterChild Jul 2014 #29

Creepy, manipulative tactics that we associate with totalitarian states woo me with science Jul 2014 #32

Supporting a warranted and justified... PosterChild Jul 2014 #34

What utter nonsense. woo me with science Jul 2014 #35

I can only... PosterChild Jul 2014 #46

From an article I wrote some years ago, truedelphi Jul 2014 #36

Something along that line ... RKP5637 Jul 2014 #47

Which makes me wonder what Dianne Feinstein has to fear since she is so willing to do whatever JDPriestly Jul 2014 #11

Or... Well, mansions like *this* don't grow on trees... MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #14

$16.5 million doesn't grow on trees either. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #15

Bwhahahahahahah!! Duress? How about the millions and millions of dollars she & hubby truedelphi Jul 2014 #37

Who do they work for? Vincardog Jul 2014 #4

I'm increasingly reminded of the old days IDemo Jul 2014 #6

It is very reminiscent, I find it very troubling, what is going on in the US now ... n/t RKP5637 Jul 2014 #49

and we used to mock them grasswire Jul 2014 #51

And Feinstein is the bill's chief backer?? RufusTFirefly Jul 2014 #8

That explains why they are keeping us busy with other things to be upset about. zeemike Jul 2014 #9

Diane Feinstein is a horrible human being DisgustipatedinCA Jul 2014 #10

Meanwhile, her husband is selling off the nation's treasured post offices RufusTFirefly Jul 2014 #13

Her husband isn't selling off post offices, the government is selling them off. George II Jul 2014 #20

Nor is a person who works in a shoe store actually selling shoes. RufusTFirefly Jul 2014 #23

In your previous post, you made it seem like it was HIS decision to sell post offices. George II Jul 2014 #30

The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us cantbeserious Jul 2014 #12

As Lord James Goldsmith stated in his interview with Charlie Rose, truedelphi Jul 2014 #38

Yes - Too True - Here Is The Link To Those Interviews - So Others Might Know The History cantbeserious Jul 2014 #41

Those interviews are very revealing. And I hope many others truedelphi Jul 2014 #45

The masses are getting restless...time to fast track things. nt NorthCarolina Jul 2014 #16

And the new agreement, TISA, would give a person a five year jail sentence for even truedelphi Jul 2014 #39

Yes, you have to ask yourself exactly WHY would such a provision be included? nt NorthCarolina Jul 2014 #53

WillyT Diclotican Jul 2014 #17

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #18

Well, if the Guardian knows about it, how can the Senate be doing it "in secret"? George II Jul 2014 #19

For one thing, the Guardian is a UK newspaper, and how truedelphi Jul 2014 #57

My point was that if it was being done "in secret", those doing it would be........ George II Jul 2014 #58

That's the side of Congress the so-called ''good guys'' control, right? DeSwiss Jul 2014 #21

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #22

It's not secret anymore... just released photo shows intel-committee discussing the new bill whereisjustice Jul 2014 #24

K&R'd! snot Jul 2014 #25

"all the better to ensure everything in this particular process remains secret." woo me with science Jul 2014 #26

I often wonder how many Americans really get what is going on ... n/t RKP5637 Jul 2014 #50

Orwell grasswire Jul 2014 #27

Unchecked, that would be the future. Enthusiast Jul 2014 #28

"Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (Cisa)" marmar Jul 2014 #31

This is important. woo me with science Jul 2014 #33

Wow, one had to wonder what the CIA and NSA have on Congress critters. Rex Jul 2014 #40

the DoJ refused to open an investigation... grasswire Jul 2014 #52

Wonder what the CIA has on the DoJ? Rex Jul 2014 #54

well it's probably Holder who makes that decision ultimately grasswire Jul 2014 #55

This still has to pass the complete Senate and will be open to amendment karynnj Jul 2014 #42

du rec. xchrom Jul 2014 #43

Not to worry. Obama will surely veto it. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #44

DiFi is a disgrace... truebrit71 Jul 2014 #48

K & Freakin r! n/t wildbilln864 Jul 2014 #56