Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
3. I have read it. It is wishful thinking "the Supreme Court would NEVER do that."
Tue Jul 22, 2014, 01:08 PM
Jul 2014

Oh yes they would. 4 of them were willing to throw out the entire law based on libertarian woo. Roberts himself bought into the woo, and decided to uphold it only because it was a tax.

Don't forget the Roberts court is the reason millions of people did not benefit from the Medicaid Expansion.

There are 4 votes right now at SCOTUS to get rid of federal exchange subsidies.

What the vox article is saying is that "John Roberts would never vote against us on that."

Wish I had that much faith in John Roberts. But I do not.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #3