Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ReRe

(12,183 posts)

30. I'm sorry...

Reply to Trillo (Reply #29)

Sun Jul 27, 2014, 06:44 PM

Jul 2014

... I forgot to mention rare extenuating circumstances, such as the one you refer to. Again, each to their own.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why So Many People Care So Much About Others' Sex Lives [View all] xchrom Jul 2014 OP

"Puritanism. The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy." - H. L. Mencken nt msanthrope Jul 2014 #1

seems like that line has been hijacked by today's GOP! NRaleighLiberal Jul 2014 #15

Interesting thesis. Thanks for posting. n/t Laelth Jul 2014 #2

because a huge number of Americans watch 'fantasy' porn everyday, even at work & school. Sunlei Jul 2014 #3

You so know porn is generally free Tetris_Iguana Jul 2014 #4

That no one is profiting.... daleanime Jul 2014 #26

No one but the website that hosts it. Tetris_Iguana Jul 2014 #27

Wouldn't that violate the 1st Amendment? AngryAmish Jul 2014 #6

What? Action_Patrol Jul 2014 #12

I think you're mixing up cause and effect bhikkhu Jul 2014 #13

A useless jesture today... Lancero Jul 2014 #24

My 2 cents; no. SamKnause Jul 2014 #5

It is the unpaid voluntarily auxillary sex police. AngryAmish Jul 2014 #7

To each there own beliefs Pakid Jul 2014 #8

It's a matter of the owners supervising their property, pretty much. bemildred Jul 2014 #9

+1 short and to the point. xchrom Jul 2014 #21

Prudery is always accompanied by the assumption that one has a right to supervise other people. bemildred Jul 2014 #22

indeed. those subtleties are always lost in our conversation about this. xchrom Jul 2014 #23

Good observation and well stated. daleo Jul 2014 #31

Reminds me of the Vogon captain in "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" Jerry442 Jul 2014 #10

Is casual sex immoral? ReRe Jul 2014 #11

FYI, couples modify their marriage agreements at times. Trillo Jul 2014 #29

I'm sorry... ReRe Jul 2014 #30

Their body, their choice. When it comes to sex and personal choices it ain't no one's business The Straight Story Jul 2014 #14

Leave my fucking farm animals alone ...damn it! L0oniX Jul 2014 #16

So the non-fucking farm animals Codeine Jul 2014 #33

There's no mystery packman Jul 2014 #17

Standardized testing and a national Codeine Jul 2014 #34

People tend to covet what they don't have? PolarVortex Jul 2014 #18

They can't have their own and El Shaman Jul 2014 #19

That thesis (though many replying appear not to have read it) makes sense. In those Squinch Jul 2014 #20

"flower must never go from bee to bee to be..." - Rodgers/hammerstein, the King and I nt msongs Jul 2014 #25

Jealousy? Tom_Foolery Jul 2014 #28

Recommend. nt Zorra Jul 2014 #32

I tell all of 'em this.... Quantess Jul 2014 #35

Funny, cause some of the same people defending the 50 Shades book BainsBane Jul 2014 #36