Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,692 posts)
8. international law?
Sun Aug 3, 2014, 11:47 AM
Aug 2014

. . .the reason our political system doesn't recognize international authority over the U.S. is the insistence that our own system of justice outstrips whatever penalties that the world community would impose.

The challenge isn't to just abandon our own justice system and expect other nations to hold our politicians and government officials accountable, it's to force our own government to uphold our own laws through our political activism and advocacy.

We're not 'crazies' for expecting that, nor are we 'naive' for expecting that 'droning on and on' will advantage the politics necessary to effect the political outcomes we advocate.

The alternative is acquiescence; silence is an abdication to mediocrity.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bush / Cheney Did more against ALL authority, recreating orpupilofnature57 Aug 2014 #1
It's not international law we should be concerned with, it is our own laws that were broken. Bluenorthwest Aug 2014 #2
Oh bolderdash ...we are exceptionalisticexpialidocious. L0oniX Aug 2014 #3
Our country PowerToThePeople Aug 2014 #4
It's so frustrating wading through the bullshit of those who wave around conservaphobe Aug 2014 #5
You think the rule of law is "crazy"? Perhaps somewhere like Saudi Arabia is more up your alley? TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #11
I'm perfectly content with my username, as well as my home here in the U.S. and my president. conservaphobe Aug 2014 #13
Technically so is Russia, England, China, and France all having Security Council a veto but we TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #6
Correct JJChambers Aug 2014 #7
Bullshit, if anyone is above the law then there is no law. The constitution creates no exception TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #10
You don't seem to understand JJChambers Aug 2014 #14
No, the current administration has elected to be accessories to the crimes but no one is above the TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #15
If the people in charge of enforcing the law JJChambers Aug 2014 #17
international law? bigtree Aug 2014 #8
Just the way it is? whatchamacallit Aug 2014 #9
Is this another way of saying, "So STHU"? WinkyDink Aug 2014 #12
"Our vital national interests" trump the law, not to mention common human decency. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2014 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We (the US) are above int...»Reply #8