Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)

5. Well, that's exactly my point.

Reply to JI7 (Reply #4)

Thu Aug 7, 2014, 12:17 AM

Aug 2014

I think the term was coined incorrectly in the first place because there ARE others who aren't of the Jewish faith who are, in fact, Semitic; however, there is no man who is a monkey.

Unless you believe in Bigfoot.

Seriously, you didn't get what I meant?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Aug 2014 OP

the article was on jewish school kids in australia and people bring up the israeli/palestinian JI7 Aug 2014 #1

Darn. I thought this thread was going to be about how wrong the Fawke Em Aug 2014 #2

we know exactly what it means in the way we are discussing it , one could look up monkey JI7 Aug 2014 #4

Well, that's exactly my point. Fawke Em Aug 2014 #5

there are many words used in ways that aren't exactly like dictionary meaning JI7 Aug 2014 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Aug 2014 #3

I don't want the term to lose meaning Aerows Aug 2014 #6

That's what I meant, above, too. Fawke Em Aug 2014 #9

Didn't they need that in a Star Trek episode? jberryhill Aug 2014 #7