Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Porn production plummets in Los Angeles [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(101,847 posts)12. Even if you stipulate the motive behind the law was a noble one what problem did it solve? /nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, there's a lot of free porn on the Internet, but most of it is apparently teasers
MineralMan
Aug 2014
#3
video on demand at hotels and satellie ppv is the only economic model that works long term
big_dog
Aug 2014
#7
Video on demand in hotels is dying also, lots of people just use there computers now...
winstars
Aug 2014
#14
Thats not a bad idea LK, if I do I will send ya a gift card to a dispensary in CO...
winstars
Aug 2014
#129
You do realize you're making the same argument as conservatives who whine about the EPA, right? nt
redqueen
Aug 2014
#2
Yep. Many on the left have a massive blind spot when it comes to this industry.
redqueen
Aug 2014
#72
My take is it was a health issue, not a moral one. Someone would test positive and
winstars
Aug 2014
#16
Actually, the fact is, she's a garden variety religious right bible-thumper, now, who has
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2014
#53
Every time you bring up Lubben, you huff and puff about how awful it is....
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Aug 2014
#134
Who needs condoms when you can watch a free compendium of artillery shoots?
Eleanors38
Aug 2014
#133
Well many are surely motivated by money and therefore would rank the health of the performers
redqueen
Aug 2014
#33
It seems hard to maintain the argument of employee safety if the jobs relocate/go underground.
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#13
Even if you stipulate the motive behind the law was a noble one what problem did it solve? /nt
DemocratSinceBirth
Aug 2014
#12
One may imagine that mandating hair-nets for food preparation employees would do the same to the res
LanternWaste
Aug 2014
#26
and the Vegas is overrun with prostitution in bars and on the strip, which is ironic
big_dog
Aug 2014
#42
You're assuming they didn't want these exact results and good riddance
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Aug 2014
#21
It might be. And if the elected officials and those who elected them are fine with it, that's 90% of
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#38
Thank you for shining a light on yet another example of the ways that so many liberals lose the plot
redqueen
Aug 2014
#83
I would love to sit the DU libertine contingent down with my family in this business
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Aug 2014
#87
Sadly the suffering caused by this industry doesn't rank very high on most peoples priority lists.
redqueen
Aug 2014
#88
A Walmart doesnt have the tax base that this industry does. If it did, we would worry about it.
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#86
Huh? I'm not the one who brought up the economic implications of this industry
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Aug 2014
#94
Nor am I, the article did. Then you wildly exaggerated my comment. I.E., created a straw man. nt
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#95
I always know someone has lost when they resort to using that bogeyman. thanks for conceding
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#120
Making a porn movie is not a private intimate relationship. It is a commercial relationship.
DanTex
Aug 2014
#24
I still think free internet porn has had a far more devastating effect on that commercial porn
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2014
#101
I also think the fact that everyone carries around a better camera with their phone
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2014
#110
There is something else going on at the same time too. NY is making a big push for the film industry
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#30
Everybody and their bastard brother Bob has a video camera, usually with their phone.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2014
#50
No question. But for those studios still trying to make a go of it... the might be being lured
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#51
I don't know if I'm ready for a New Yorker vibe in my smut, honestly.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2014
#54
No it hasn't. It has reduced the risk, but it has not "ensured they can not be... exposed to STDs"
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#59
No medical professional will tell you that most OSHA guidelines or regulations will 100% eliminate
redqueen
Aug 2014
#61
No, it doesnt. Either something protects 100%, or it doesnt. Thats a medical issue, not a legal one.
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#97
People post amateur porn for free, never understood why some pay for pro porn. n/t
RKP5637
Aug 2014
#57
People don't like condoms. You might as well be complaining about kids not liking brussel sprouts.
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#107
If you're so absolutely convinced of your argument then mandate condoms for ALL
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#115