General Discussion

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)

28. The reason it came a week later is because IT WAS NOT A ROBBERY.

Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:10 AM

Aug 2014

They had to make up the story. It took a week to do so.

Most likely scenario, store clerk got in Brown's face. Brown intimidated him into getting out of his face. Store clerk remembers the altercation after Brown gets killed, calls the cops. Cops see easy way to make up their story.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] MohRokTah Aug 2014 OP

Per the banner on CNN, he had the cigars on him. LisaL Aug 2014 #1

And we belive CNN why Robbins Aug 2014 #3

good point...... chillfactor Aug 2014 #6

There are no cigars anywhere near the body MohRokTah Aug 2014 #8

You can't see what's in the pockets or behind the body. LisaL Aug 2014 #39

You don't have to believe anything. LisaL Aug 2014 #13

Who ya gonna believe, CNN or yer own lyin' eyes? Iggo Aug 2014 #17

That was someone pushing someone else around in the store... wtf, the FPD are making things worse uponit7771 Aug 2014 #2

It was Brown in the video stills, definitely. No doubt whatsoever. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #5

wow..identifying somone by clothes... chillfactor Aug 2014 #9

The combination is unique. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #11

really? chillfactor Aug 2014 #21

The reason it came a week later is because IT WAS NOT A ROBBERY. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #28

Well, as far as conspiracy theory go, I guess it's as good as any. LisaL Aug 2014 #33

This is false on its face uponit7771 Aug 2014 #24

It is more than clothes dsc Aug 2014 #20

Are there any stills from the QuikTrip yet? JustAnotherGen Aug 2014 #10

WRONG!! sandals do NOT match, nor does the length of the shorts.. stop stirring shit. uponit7771 Aug 2014 #18

Sandals match precisely. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #22

No they don't, not only that but the length of the shorts don't match... on the ground the bottom uponit7771 Aug 2014 #30

Seriously? LisaL Aug 2014 #38

What sandals? LisaL Aug 2014 #26

All the Video stills prove Robbins Aug 2014 #29

Looks like some type of violent confrontation itsrobert Aug 2014 #31

The shirt looks the same but don't the pants look different to you? (nt) Nye Bevan Aug 2014 #35

well you must have exceptional eyes..... chillfactor Aug 2014 #4

See post 5, it was Brown. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #7

I saw post 5..... chillfactor Aug 2014 #14

No need to. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #16

Wow. Iggo Aug 2014 #23

fuckin wow!!!, Those close and that style is in NO WAY unique to one person. You've GOT to be kiddin uponit7771 Aug 2014 #32

Photos taken within minutes of each other. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #37

I agree. The clothes are the same pintobean Aug 2014 #27

Yep, even if it was a robbery (and I do not believe it was) it doesn't matter. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #45

Didnt' they say JustAnotherGen Aug 2014 #12

See post 5 MohRokTah Aug 2014 #15

Who said that and when? LisaL Aug 2014 #19

This is just a distraction, anyway, from the policeman's actions. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #25

This. riqster Aug 2014 #47

The still pictures match almost identically to the person that was killed Renew Deal Aug 2014 #34

Speculation, no way does that footage show it is him. Rex Aug 2014 #36

Going by clothing is reasonable and has been used numerous times in making ID. LisaL Aug 2014 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #41

I don't see any dates on these stills Beaverhausen Aug 2014 #42

IT took six days to make up the robbery story. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #48

I don't know why this matters unless it's okay to shoot people in the back? bettyellen Aug 2014 #43

you might have said "it might be him" Enrique Aug 2014 #44

It's definitely him. See post 5. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #46