Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Beaverhausen

(24,699 posts)

42. I don't see any dates on these stills

Reply to MohRokTah (Original post)

Fri Aug 15, 2014, 11:14 AM

Aug 2014

And why it took 6 days to come out? Utter fucking bullshit.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] MohRokTah Aug 2014 OP

Per the banner on CNN, he had the cigars on him. LisaL Aug 2014 #1

And we belive CNN why Robbins Aug 2014 #3

good point...... chillfactor Aug 2014 #6

There are no cigars anywhere near the body MohRokTah Aug 2014 #8

You can't see what's in the pockets or behind the body. LisaL Aug 2014 #39

You don't have to believe anything. LisaL Aug 2014 #13

Who ya gonna believe, CNN or yer own lyin' eyes? Iggo Aug 2014 #17

That was someone pushing someone else around in the store... wtf, the FPD are making things worse uponit7771 Aug 2014 #2

It was Brown in the video stills, definitely. No doubt whatsoever. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #5

wow..identifying somone by clothes... chillfactor Aug 2014 #9

The combination is unique. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #11

really? chillfactor Aug 2014 #21

The reason it came a week later is because IT WAS NOT A ROBBERY. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #28

Well, as far as conspiracy theory go, I guess it's as good as any. LisaL Aug 2014 #33

This is false on its face uponit7771 Aug 2014 #24

It is more than clothes dsc Aug 2014 #20

Are there any stills from the QuikTrip yet? JustAnotherGen Aug 2014 #10

WRONG!! sandals do NOT match, nor does the length of the shorts.. stop stirring shit. uponit7771 Aug 2014 #18

Sandals match precisely. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #22

No they don't, not only that but the length of the shorts don't match... on the ground the bottom uponit7771 Aug 2014 #30

Seriously? LisaL Aug 2014 #38

What sandals? LisaL Aug 2014 #26

All the Video stills prove Robbins Aug 2014 #29

Looks like some type of violent confrontation itsrobert Aug 2014 #31

The shirt looks the same but don't the pants look different to you? (nt) Nye Bevan Aug 2014 #35

well you must have exceptional eyes..... chillfactor Aug 2014 #4

See post 5, it was Brown. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #7

I saw post 5..... chillfactor Aug 2014 #14

No need to. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #16

Wow. Iggo Aug 2014 #23

fuckin wow!!!, Those close and that style is in NO WAY unique to one person. You've GOT to be kiddin uponit7771 Aug 2014 #32

Photos taken within minutes of each other. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #37

I agree. The clothes are the same pintobean Aug 2014 #27

Yep, even if it was a robbery (and I do not believe it was) it doesn't matter. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #45

Didnt' they say JustAnotherGen Aug 2014 #12

See post 5 MohRokTah Aug 2014 #15

Who said that and when? LisaL Aug 2014 #19

This is just a distraction, anyway, from the policeman's actions. WinkyDink Aug 2014 #25

This. riqster Aug 2014 #47

The still pictures match almost identically to the person that was killed Renew Deal Aug 2014 #34

Speculation, no way does that footage show it is him. Rex Aug 2014 #36

Going by clothing is reasonable and has been used numerous times in making ID. LisaL Aug 2014 #40

This message was self-deleted by its author Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #41

I don't see any dates on these stills Beaverhausen Aug 2014 #42

IT took six days to make up the robbery story. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #48

I don't know why this matters unless it's okay to shoot people in the back? bettyellen Aug 2014 #43

you might have said "it might be him" Enrique Aug 2014 #44

It's definitely him. See post 5. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #46