Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Even if Brown did commit robbery... [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)89. This is your OP:
"what's to say he was beating the policeman who shot him? Just the policeman's word?"
Answers to those questions are:
1. If an examination of Mr. Brown's body indicated fresh offensive wounds, it would be evidence of him having recently hit someone.
2. If an examination of Mr. Brown's body indicated absence of offensive wounds, one would have to ask a medical examiner whether that meant he did not hit someone.
I am not a medical examiner. Finding "something" may be indicative of "something". Finding "nothing" may or may not be indicative of "something" or "nothing".
Your question was directed to whether there could be any evidence of him "beating the policeman". Yes, there can be evidence of having beat someone, and how long ago one may have beat someone.
It is also important to understand what the word "evidence" means, as distinguished from what the word "proof" means, since people tend to confuse the use of those two words.
As to "Is it possible to hit someone and not sustain an injury?" I have no earthly idea. Many things are "possible". As a proposition, I would believe, absent further education on the point, that if one person was to hit another person without a weapon in a manner sufficient to inflict injury, then it seems likely one would have a corresponding injury of some kind.
Physics doesn't care if you slam your face into my fist, or whether I slam my fist into your face. Either way, it is a collision between bones wrapped in skin.
Various kinds of physical confrontations are reconstructed or rendered more or less likely from physical evidence all of the time, and some wounds can be characterized as defensive (such as stab wounds on the palms of a person trying to avoid being stabbed) or offensive (such as bruising to the knuckles of someone who has punched someone else).
It may also be that the evidence is indeterminate. If your skin is found under my fingernails, I may have been trying to restrain you, or I may have been trying to scratch you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
1. It is an assault; looks like battery, too. 2. Crimes aren't mere "stupid stuff." 3. The murdered
WinkyDink
Aug 2014
#6
I agree. We are not doing ourselves any favors by trying to minimize or cover up Brown's violence.
JJChambers
Aug 2014
#8
'reasonable doubt' about killing someone while the person is down on the ground after being shot?
L0oniX
Aug 2014
#26
Too much of a stretch, and no, sandals are not unique. They don't even really look alike to me.
Xyzse
Aug 2014
#25
You do realize how lighting impacts how things look in photographs, right? n/t
Ms. Toad
Aug 2014
#29
I took that also in to account. I am not saying that it isn't possible that it is him, just that I
Xyzse
Aug 2014
#65
This is what will let a cop get away with executing a man over cigars in the streets.
MohRokTah
Aug 2014
#13
These pictures are not very good. What was Brown wearing when he was killed? Do they match
jwirr
Aug 2014
#39
It was the same guy. Its hard to argue that the officer didn't have a reason to stop him.
JJChambers
Aug 2014
#49
This thread makes me sick, too many people who are looking for an excuse to write this one off
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#87