Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
Sat Aug 23, 2014, 08:28 AM Aug 2014

White House seeks Congressional Mandate to use American military in Iraq again. [View all]

Last edited Sat Aug 23, 2014, 09:38 AM - Edit history (2)

I'm sorry to say so, but it looks like all of those poor, worn-out, PTSD-suffering multiple combat tour veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan are about to be ordered to "mount up" once again. The Pentagon is going back to war where they like doing war the best, in those oil-rich deserts of the Middle East!


Militant Islamist fighters on a tank take part in a military parade along the streets of northern Raqqa province (Reuters)

US considers broad military action against Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

As the US has acknowledged that the Islamic State group is a greater threat than Al-Qaeda, the White House is reportedly seeking domestic legal justification at home to use unlimited military force against the Sunni extremists in Iraq and Syria. On Friday, the Obama administration said that the killing of American journalist James Foley by Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) militants amounts to a direct terrorist attack on the United States.

"We have seen them posing a threat to our interests in the region, to our personnel and facilities in the region, and clearly the brutal execution of Jim Foley represented an affront, an attack - not just on him, he's an American - and we see that as an attack on our country, when one of our own is killed like that," said Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes.

This comes a day after US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel stressed that the IS terrorist organization is so well funded and managed, that it “is beyond anything that we've seen. So we must prepare for everything.”

Now the White House is considering seeking domestic approval for military action and a mandate from Congress would do just fine, a senior administration official told the Washington Post.

(snip)


Read more at: http://rt.com/usa/182280-us-threat-isis-syria/




STOP THE NEW IRAQ WAR NOW!

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/write-or-call


83 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No F#cking Way. He was elected to get us out of Iraq, not to continue a neocon vision of a long war. grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #1
It's the guys who weren't elected we need to worry about . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #12
Maybe if we focused more on electing congresscritters who give the authority? TheNutcracker Aug 2014 #32
You know, he's tossing it back where it belongs. Skidmore Aug 2014 #39
Come on, guys. Relax. IDemo Aug 2014 #2
Yeah, I think I heard that too. another_liberal Aug 2014 #6
...according to RT...nt SidDithers Aug 2014 #3
As we all know.... DonViejo Aug 2014 #5
What do you think is reported incorrectly? another_liberal Aug 2014 #9
Here - IDemo Aug 2014 #10
Thank you . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #13
I find it astounding that those commenting think the Obama administration justiceischeap Aug 2014 #4
Oh yeah, another_liberal Aug 2014 #7
No, we don't but we have a different commander in chief justiceischeap Aug 2014 #8
If we the people demand it be handled differently, maybe it will be . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #14
I find it rather odd that your condemning the US in trying to stop ISIS from IronGate Aug 2014 #20
There Is A Unifying Principle, Sir: West Bad, Against West Good The Magistrate Aug 2014 #22
How bout we prosecute those that funded ISIS - Mcain, Graham, & Bandar Bush? grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #27
How about we do both? IronGate Aug 2014 #28
Because our projection of force into the region has been proven time and again to be one big FAIL. grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #33
Yet you seem to be in favor of Russian projection of force into Ukraine. nt. IronGate Aug 2014 #34
I'm in favor of neither. We have too many problems at home to be wasting 60-80% of our budget on the grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #36
And what? IronGate Aug 2014 #41
I don't want our troops to fight Saudi Arabias war for them. Let the Sauds & Iran & the Kurds band grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #42
You Could Prosecute All The House Of Saud, Sir, For Damn Near Anything, With No Objection From Me The Magistrate Aug 2014 #37
Yes they do. Had we not invaded Iraq, there would be no ISIS. Had we not funded the elements in grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #46
Ritual Noises, Sir, Only Make Me Laugh The Magistrate Aug 2014 #52
Always a pleasure:) grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #55
"ritual noise"... SidDithers Aug 2014 #56
We destabilized the Ukraine too... Remember Victorian Neuland? Stop fostering the neo con vision of grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #25
Sorry, but that meme? Debunked several times already, IronGate Aug 2014 #30
Disagree. Can you agree the Iraq war til now is a disaster? grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #35
Sure, I can agree that it was a disaster, I witnessed the ineptness first hand, IronGate Aug 2014 #44
In my view, we can't fix it, because we are the problem. And because the war is 1400 years old. We grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #49
We shall see. IronGate Aug 2014 #50
And my best to you and yours:) grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #53
Where the hell is this "wholehearted" support for invading Ukraine? TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #47
Poster has consistently supported Russian intervention in Ukraine, IronGate Aug 2014 #48
One fucking person? Representing what, upwards of 10's of people in all of the west? TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #70
You asked, I answered. nt. IronGate Aug 2014 #71
This message was self-deleted by its author IronGate Aug 2014 #58
I don't recollect such but I don't oppose humanitarian relief. Didn't oppose relief drops TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #65
Oooops!!!! You're right, you didn't and I apologize for that. IronGate Aug 2014 #67
When did I say I supported any invasion of a sovereign country? another_liberal Aug 2014 #51
You were saying just yesterday that you supported those Russian trucks IronGate Aug 2014 #69
I ruled out any "rationalized bull" . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #73
It is an invasion if the Ukrainaian govt. didn't give permission to enter. nt. IronGate Aug 2014 #75
The question remains as before . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #76
You supported those trucks crossing into Ukraine yesterday without the Ukrainian Govt. IronGate Aug 2014 #77
Do you honestly think that constituted an "invasion?" another_liberal Aug 2014 #79
They crossed into sovereign Ukrainian terrority with out permission, IronGate Aug 2014 #80
What? He already calls torturers "patriots" and is expanding the Iraq war, how's that different? grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #24
They'll be jst as wrong here as when they breathlessly predicted that Obama JoePhilly Aug 2014 #11
He is still planning on Syria as reported yesterday: grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #29
Yeah right. 99Forever Aug 2014 #15
"War Fatigue"? NO! it's "War for Greed"! And it's evil. And endless. Don't get fooled again. grahamhgreen Aug 2014 #23
I call BS on the whole article, it is just a Russian journalists opinion....calm down folks. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #16
Gosh . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #17
Russia Today? Make that a whole BOX of salt! LloydS of New London Aug 2014 #18
"I'm gonna' hate me some Russians." another_liberal Aug 2014 #19
Says the biggest Russia supporter here, IronGate Aug 2014 #21
I take it you've never seen "American History X?" another_liberal Aug 2014 #43
Own the movie, thought it was one of Edward Norton's best. nt. IronGate Aug 2014 #54
Good . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #59
I would have the same dose of salt if it were an American journalist opinion on any channel. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #78
I've seen some "Become a Reservist" commercials on TV recently. valerief Aug 2014 #26
This may just be the starting point fadedrose Aug 2014 #31
Agree, a draft is absolutely necessary... BaggersRDumb Aug 2014 #40
Either that or we taxpayers are going to be made to foot the bill . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #45
There isn't going to be a draft Lurks Often Aug 2014 #57
Then we will be hiring mercenaries faster than the Roman Empire in decline . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #61
Either pay for a larger standing military or pay for independent contractors Lurks Often Aug 2014 #64
Yeah, too right . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #68
Erect Bogeyman, wave flag, give money to the MIC, send troops, and talk about peace. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2014 #38
The neat part is each time you cycle the boogieman gets worse and it is easier to incite TheKentuckian Aug 2014 #60
+100000000 woo me with science Aug 2014 #62
Don't count your New Iraq Wars before they're hatched. ucrdem Aug 2014 #63
I hope you're right about that, my cautious friend . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #66
Well, we went down this road a year ago, when Assad was accused of using chemical weapons, ucrdem Aug 2014 #72
Like I said . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #74
Ooooooh that must hurt. Meanwhile ... GeorgeGist Aug 2014 #81
Really? I mean... Really? rock Aug 2014 #82
kick woo me with science Aug 2014 #83
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House seeks Congres...