Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(56 posts)

12. ha, yeah...maybe it was in an earlier draft.

Sat Aug 23, 2014, 08:50 AM

Aug 2014

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

... Agschmid Aug 2014 #1

hear, hear! Stellar Aug 2014 #9

ha, yeah...maybe it was in an earlier draft. echochamberlain Aug 2014 #12

I guess you missed this one.. X_Digger Aug 2014 #13

The meaning of the phrase "well-regulated" in the 2nd amendment imthevicar Aug 2014 #18

Hahahaha FarPoint Aug 2014 #3

Well thank god you've come along to set us all straight. Sheldon Cooper Aug 2014 #4

Boring. IBTL pintobean Aug 2014 #5

Why exactly do you find it boring? tridim Aug 2014 #11

Ssdd. Most people pintobean Aug 2014 #14

I think it's very creative and is hitting a few nerves. tridim Aug 2014 #16

yes, why exactly..? echochamberlain Aug 2014 #17

should the first admendment not cover the internet? Travis_0004 Aug 2014 #7

HERP to the mutha fucking derp n?t bobduca Aug 2014 #8

KnR. This is worthy of a DUzy! nt tblue37 Aug 2014 #10

Locking etherealtruth Aug 2014 #20