General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mothers Group Hammers Grocery Chain For Allowing Domestic Terrorists To Wander Their Aisles [View all]krispos42
(49,445 posts)The definition is very broad; a legacy of BushCo, most likely. It conveniently makes pretty much any political or social campaign 2/3rds terrorism. Boycotting Hobby Lobby? 2/3rds terrorism. Yay, freedom, and all that jazz.
The difference is, of course, that if a person decides to get a gun out of his safe, drive down to the nearest supermarket or cinema or school, and open fire on random innocent people until stopped, then statements of corporate or school policy is going to be worth far less than the signs they are printed on.
I understand that it is, at least, visually, disturbing and at least moderately disruptive, which is why I think state law restricting open-carry would be a good idea.
Can it be done without being part of a larger gun-control bill that contains useless pandering provisions that put Republicans in power?
That's up to your side, I think.