Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Michael Moore is being crticized for racism, not policy commentary [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)146. Here's my tweet:
https://twitter.com/joshcryer/status/510337405833191424
It's not showing up in his "feed" because either I don't know how twitter works or he blocked replies showing up in his list.
I used the word "presentably" there loosely, btw, because 95% of the shit Obama gets shit on for are things that actually didn't happen or happened under his watch or just realpolitik. He offers up SS cuts, as per his own campaign promise, that means he's actually, literally, cutting SS (nevermind the poverty exemptions which would've brought millions of seniors out of poverty; ie, it was never going to pass in a teaparty controlled house).
I'd say 99% of the criticisms come from the right wing rebranded as a left wing criticism. I started to recognize this when Better Believe It was banned for using right wing sources, criticizing the ACA. It is actually sort of strange when the right wing is using left wing arguments to bolster an anti-left critique, but it never really occurred to me that it was happening until BBI did it.
Surprised, yeah, I'm in the same camp. I am completely unsurprised by the arguments at this point. In 2008-2009, yeah, it would've bothered me, but these days it's damn natural. And, I say this, having my first post on DU locked criticizing Obama's Warren pick for the inauguration. I admit I was messing around then, but let's be forthright here, Obama gets shit on for the smallest thing he actually didn't do but was said to be doing, and then more so, shit on for doing things that weren't as impactful as people desire.
It's not showing up in his "feed" because either I don't know how twitter works or he blocked replies showing up in his list.
I used the word "presentably" there loosely, btw, because 95% of the shit Obama gets shit on for are things that actually didn't happen or happened under his watch or just realpolitik. He offers up SS cuts, as per his own campaign promise, that means he's actually, literally, cutting SS (nevermind the poverty exemptions which would've brought millions of seniors out of poverty; ie, it was never going to pass in a teaparty controlled house).
I'd say 99% of the criticisms come from the right wing rebranded as a left wing criticism. I started to recognize this when Better Believe It was banned for using right wing sources, criticizing the ACA. It is actually sort of strange when the right wing is using left wing arguments to bolster an anti-left critique, but it never really occurred to me that it was happening until BBI did it.
Surprised, yeah, I'm in the same camp. I am completely unsurprised by the arguments at this point. In 2008-2009, yeah, it would've bothered me, but these days it's damn natural. And, I say this, having my first post on DU locked criticizing Obama's Warren pick for the inauguration. I admit I was messing around then, but let's be forthright here, Obama gets shit on for the smallest thing he actually didn't do but was said to be doing, and then more so, shit on for doing things that weren't as impactful as people desire.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Michael Moore is being crticized for racism, not policy commentary [View all]
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
OP
Re: "clean and articulate" - are you calling Joe Biden a racist by definition?
bullwinkle428
Sep 2014
#10
So, President Obama will not be remembered as being the first black president?
joeglow3
Sep 2014
#30
that is ONE thing for which he will be remembered. The point is that defining black people
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#33
No, this is just MM and his ilk playing the race card in order to attack the President.
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#48
No, it's my view that Moore saying that Obama is nothing but the color of his skin is racist.
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#51
Anyone who says that all Obama has accomplished is being the first black President is a racist.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#39
Like Maher, whatever talent he had seems to be slipping. Reduced to insult humor.
NYC_SKP
Sep 2014
#7
I think that people decide that his comments are racist because they approve of President Obama's
el_bryanto
Sep 2014
#8
Even if you take racism out of the equation, what Moore said was, at the very least, very ignorant.
randome
Sep 2014
#11
we're talking two different things--criticizing americans for having a very shallow
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#32
No but I also think if you boil down the President's accomplishments in office
el_bryanto
Sep 2014
#34
again, amongst whom, people who actually pay attention to policy or superficial ignoramuses
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#36
The ACA is not 'tiny'--certainly not in terms of political importance and history
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#42
OK we disagree on that - I hope that the ACA will be remembered as a tiny step forward
el_bryanto
Sep 2014
#94
"Utterly indefensible" - than why, in your opinion, would someone defend it?
el_bryanto
Sep 2014
#97
to drag his race into a discussion of his policies as a means of attacking him is racism.
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#98
and my point is that one can call him a centrist squish (which I do!) without resorting to dragging
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#116
happened before I was born. cultural wave is probably a good description though nt
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#81
Wilson is a great case in point, folks say 'WW1' and that's all they know. Wilson was a huge racist
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2014
#29
That's all accurate - and he apparently approved of the message of Birth of a Nation
el_bryanto
Sep 2014
#35
"Has Obama done noteworthy and positive things as President?" If you answered "no", then...
NYC_SKP
Sep 2014
#15
You don't think digging us out of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression,
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#40
TARP was passed earlier. But the $800 million economic stimulus was passed under Obama.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#107
That 832 million averted a far worse financial crisis and arrested the 400,000 monthly job losses
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#125
I don't think this latest point is racist, but the one about the 9/11 planes...yikes!
Threedifferentones
Sep 2014
#14
I disagree with him on the substance--certainly I think when his full 8 years
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#28
Ask 99% of Straight America what Harvey Milk did, they will say 'first elected openly gay man'.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2014
#38
Characterization is an editorial act. It is not the same as comprehension of content.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2014
#50
true. point i was making is when a person makes a claim about future perceptions
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#53
Moore's comments were not painting Obama as an heroic first. They were insulting, dismissive,
MADem
Sep 2014
#90
Exactly. Thank you, MADem. And the reaction from the miniscule number of black posters that still
Number23
Sep 2014
#134
I don't think Michael Moore would like to be reduced to a single physical characteristic.
MADem
Sep 2014
#139
your concern is touching, please note that his presidency has been declared 'over'
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#95
I'm criticizing Michael Moore for his willful ignorance and his racism.. he does this because he
Cha
Sep 2014
#22
Calling him fat? Well, that's...that's...pretty much equivalent to what he said about Obama.
randome
Sep 2014
#52
Yep. Being reduced to a single physical characteristic is ... what's the word? ...Dehumanizing!!!
MADem
Sep 2014
#138
maybe I should put it this way: why bring Obama's skin pigment into a discussion of policy?
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#67
becoming president is an accomplishment, but it's not an accomplishment as president.
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#123
how is the president's race relevant to a discussion of his actions in office?
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#113
thanks for your thoughtful, constructive contributions to the discussion nt
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#120
There does seem to be an automatic dismissal of President Obama by many people.
gordianot
Sep 2014
#70
Jesus Christ. No one will remember Obama for Lily Ledbetter, DADT, or the economy in 100 years.
Dawgs
Sep 2014
#99
almost everyone is at least a little racist. main differential is self-awareness
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#85
YES. His comment was racist. He should be ashamed of himself, but he probably isn't.
MADem
Sep 2014
#87
For some, unless the racism comes in the form of "that word", it isn't really racism.
Behind the Aegis
Sep 2014
#102
Exactly.. they wouldn't know "racism" if it stared back at them in the mirror.. mahalo, BtA~
Cha
Sep 2014
#129
Recently purchased flash cards for my kids that cover all of the US presidents
abelenkpe
Sep 2014
#114