Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jwirr

(39,215 posts)

11. Greed.

Reply to Samantha (Original post)

Fri Sep 12, 2014, 11:43 AM

Sep 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What might have prompted Dick Cheney to appear in DC to speak out about current events? [View all] Samantha Sep 2014 OP

It is time for Cheney to severe his ties with the Us government. Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #1

It is a breach of protocol in DC for a past President or Vice President to criticise the current Samantha Sep 2014 #6

Apparently he doesnt know he needs to respect boundries. Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #8

True -- neither literal nor figurative boundaries are observed by Cheney Samantha Sep 2014 #9

Or you can just go with the more obvious answer. Aerows Sep 2014 #29

Obviously, you are a very perceptive person Samantha Sep 2014 #35

Ray Charles Aerows Sep 2014 #36

Better question is, why would anyone listen or care ? n/t jaysunb Sep 2014 #2

One always has to wonder when Cheney steps back into the spotlight Samantha Sep 2014 #7

He wants to be Jeb's vice president Retrograde Sep 2014 #28

Maybe he's helping to look for the Politicalboi Sep 2014 #3

That money was never "misplaced". brush Sep 2014 #5

Securing a piece of the war profits for Haliburton DJ13 Sep 2014 #4

There was a very intelligent female commentator on Lawrence O'Donnell's show last evening Samantha Sep 2014 #10

bingo! liberal_at_heart Sep 2014 #23

Greed. jwirr Sep 2014 #11

When I hear "increased calls for boots on the ground" Samantha Sep 2014 #15

Exactly. Back in WWII we called it profiteering. If we must have wars we should make then jwirr Sep 2014 #19

I was wondering if there is a way to find out who is awarded government contracts Samantha Sep 2014 #20

If you have a good congressman/woman I would call them and ask if the info is available. jwirr Sep 2014 #21

Look what I just found! Samantha Sep 2014 #22

There is a reason that the Defense Department never was audited during W term and I doubt it jwirr Sep 2014 #24

There is one thing I know but it is not from a Google search Samantha Sep 2014 #25

During the Iran/Contra trials they talked about secret sluch funds for the CIA and some of the jwirr Sep 2014 #37

Exactly Samantha Sep 2014 #38

Once upon a time war profiteering was considered treason, and if convicted, one could even tblue37 Sep 2014 #39

Now it is still treason but there is no punishment for it. We now call it good business practices. jwirr Sep 2014 #40

Going on the attack to prevent from being investigated Populist_Prole Sep 2014 #12

I would like to think most Americans by now will accept absolutely no defense Samantha Sep 2014 #17

He's a greedy sadistic bastard who has not been held accountable J_J_ Sep 2014 #13

Someone dialed hell for an opinion. mmonk Sep 2014 #14

I think you've got it (n/t) Samantha Sep 2014 #18

A full moon? Shorter daylight hours? hatrack Sep 2014 #16

He was howling about Obama Samantha Sep 2014 #34

Was he out in daylight? liberal N proud Sep 2014 #26

The crypt needed sweeping and his dr said Ilsa Sep 2014 #27

Advance pub for an upcoming biopic? Joe Magarac Sep 2014 #30

attention whores need attention for their last gasp at relevency eom ladywnch Sep 2014 #31

The Time of the Harvest draws nigh, and the brethren gather to feed upon the living. Orsino Sep 2014 #32

Saturday nights bring out the best in DU responses Samantha Sep 2014 #33