Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
11. I'd really like to know where in the Constitution he sees the ability of the
Sun Sep 14, 2014, 12:49 PM
Sep 2014

President to start any war without a Congressional vote.

This is 2014. They don't need to ride a horse from Maine to Washington D.C. to vote. They can use the internet.

But when they did have to ride a horse, the Constitution still said they needed to vote.

I guess "imminent" is subject to interpretation. Isn't everything?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obama buys into John Yoo's stupid view Vattel Sep 2014 #1
Does Obama really buy into John Yoo's view? (Or Bybee's?) merrily Sep 2014 #3
He may not accept Yoo's views on detention and interrogation. But he agrees Vattel Sep 2014 #4
He cited the AUMF, not authority inherent in the Presidency. merrily Sep 2014 #5
Recently he has cited his inherent authority. Now he is also citing AUMF. Vattel Sep 2014 #6
Link? (Context and exact wording would be critical.) merrily Sep 2014 #7
He and his advisers are just throwing stuff against the wall to see what will stick. amandabeech Sep 2014 #17
I agree Vattel Sep 2014 #20
I googled for the full text and look where I found it first. merrily Sep 2014 #2
Still not sure how these apply to Syria.... grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #9
Are you trying to think like a politician? merrily Sep 2014 #12
Like a lawyer. grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #13
You mean, actual words with actual meanings? merrily Sep 2014 #14
Senator Obama in 2007: woo me with science Sep 2014 #8
Obviously, that Obama guy was a Fringe Leftist who hated America. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #10
I am actually worried what'll happen to the Premies on this board come Jan. 2017 MisterP Sep 2014 #15
I'd really like to know where in the Constitution he sees the ability of the merrily Sep 2014 #11
Both the 2001 and 2003 AUMFs remain the law of the land tritsofme Sep 2014 #16
Could you be so kind as to send me the quote or section that authorizes it? grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #18
Interesting tritsofme Sep 2014 #19
So, if the action turns into a disaster, a Republican Congress could potentially lay the whole grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Sees Iraq Resolutio...»Reply #11