Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton denounces income inequality in populist speech [View all]nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)19. Secretary Clinton Comments on the Transpacific System (TPP)
The Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty is the complete opposite of 'free trade'
The TPP would strip our constitutional rights, while offering no gains for the majority of Americans. It's a win for corporations
Mark Weisbrot The Guardian Tuesday 19 November 2013
...Exhibit A was released by WikiLeaks last week: the latest draft of the "intellectual property" chapter of the agreement, one of 24 (out of 29) chapters that do not have to do with trade. This chapter has provisions that will make it easier for pharmaceutical companies to get patents, including in developing countries; have these patents for more years; and extend the ability of these companies to limit access to the scientific data that is necessary for other researchers to develop new medicines. And the United States is even pushing for provisions that would allow surgical procedures to be patented provisions that may be currently against US law...
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/19/trans-pacific-partnership-corporate-usurp-congress
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/19/trans-pacific-partnership-corporate-usurp-congress
Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Centre for Economic and Policy Research in Washington DC. He is also president of Just Foreign Policy. He co-wrote Oliver Stone's documentary South of the Border.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You don't think she's changed her views since 2005. I think the 2008 financial crisis changed them.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#80
Hillary supported her husband as the First Lady. Would you expect her to oppose him publicly?
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#79
fair rebuttal, but not everything in that record is a contradiction, and a lot is pro-labor, and she
still_one
Sep 2014
#24
I understand how one may not agree with everything, but I really disagree with the characterization
still_one
Sep 2014
#85
Hillary is a principle architect of the TTP which will hugely exacerbate income inequality
cali
Sep 2014
#3
Oh, that TPP that is still a work in progress, and of which you have no way of knowing
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#5
A secret work in progress that we know will not benefit working class Americans.
Enthusiast
Sep 2014
#97
I will whenever I want to. I'm sick of ignorant people misstating her positions. n/t
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#7
He'd posted it before under another comment of mine just a day or so back.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Sep 2014
#37
misstating it, misrepresenting it, and obviously not even aware of her voting record. What that
still_one
Sep 2014
#15
These drafts are works in progress put together by people/countries with competing interests
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#20
There's nothing to come out against when the draft is still being negotiated. n/t
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#31
As SoS, her job was to represent POTUS's positions, not her own. And the agreement
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#22
She won't have one until it's final. And she isn't a governmental official anymore,
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#27
I'm interested in what Hillary supposedly did in Honduras. Do you have a link for that?
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#82
Your post doesn't contain a single specific. She was an extremely popular Senator
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#30
So does Rand Paul, even if that wind changes directions 12 times in a day.
bullwinkle428
Sep 2014
#40
Let me guess. It doesn't matter what she ever says or what she ever actually voted for
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#48
Even better. Your mind has been closed up tight since 2008. What an admission. n/t
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#81
Yes, it's such a shame that she's donating all that speech money to the Clinton Foundation.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#51
No, I was referring to ALL her speaking fees, not just to non-profits like colleges.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#73
Yeah, so? I don't think she's a liar, but we'll find out when she runs (if she does) and releases
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#77
Does she sound like a Republican to you? Many people are insisting there's no difference
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#53
I didn't think Hillary and Barack were far apart in 2008 and I don't now either.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#72
Did she make this speech before she was "flat broke"? Or, after her Goldman Sachs gig?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2014
#56
No link: Positions on progressive taxes, support for unions, regulation, safety net, etc.? n/t
pampango
Sep 2014
#60
Hillary can stand on her record, no doubt about it, who else can stand up to her experience?
Thinkingabout
Sep 2014
#84