Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,181 posts)
18. It is important that we keep a timeline going
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 01:28 PM
Sep 2014

for retrieval as the war drums get louder.
Al I know is that last year, Obama wanted to attack Syria but could not get enough popular support for it
and this spring IS-whatever popped up, there has been lots of news about how bad they are
yet
when there was WH talk of "helping" out Iraq, Malaki promptly said no thanks, we got this.
Following that, there was suddenly talk about Malaki needing to go away.

July of this year....news headline:
Iraq PM al-Malaki scorns calls for his resignation
"I will never give up the nomination for the post of prime minister," he said in a statement issued by his office.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/iraq-pm-al-malaki-scorns-calls-for-his-resignation-1.2696128

One month later:
Iraq Has New Leadership, Al-Malaki Will Step Aside
http://www.npr.org/2014/08/15/340562882/iraq-has-new-leadership-al-malaki-will-step-aside

And NOW all the talk is how we are going to spend millions on "moderate" Syrian rebels, the ones that are fighting Assad.
And how we are going to have a few thousand "advisors" in Iraq, to show Iraqis where to aim their guns.

Plus it has gotten strangely quiet, news wise, about Afghanistan.

McCain and Lindsey Graham ( Bill Maher called him the "Blanche Dubois of the Republican Party&quot are all busy telling us we will have ISIS slitting out throats in the grocery stores here.....

I am waiting for an "I told you so" incident in this country.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Arab speakers call them Daesh. It's an acronym for something or other. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2014 #1
... It's complicated. politicat Sep 2014 #8
Bogeyman #332? Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #2
Actually, just now on MSNBC where I heard Power say 'ISSLE' there was a ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #6
Khorasan. Just a new name for an old member of Al Qaeda. CJCRANE Sep 2014 #9
Thanks, CJCRANE! Appreciate the help with that. nt ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #10
How about Boogeyman Du Joir? 99Forever Sep 2014 #13
They're about as subtle as a turd in a salad. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #14
Right? And something else that's change today vs. yesterday is that ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #15
It is important that we keep a timeline going dixiegrrrrl Sep 2014 #18
WE should call them "result of 50 years of absurd interference in the Middle East by USA" randys1 Sep 2014 #3
When you translate a word from a foreign language tritsofme Sep 2014 #4
How about calling them NEW and then stick with it? sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #17
It's not another name,both simply pronounced ISIL using sufrommich Sep 2014 #5
Exactly my point... so... Why? If everyone is using the long-form pronunciation, why ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #7
It rhymes with missile and fissile. CJCRANE Sep 2014 #11
It does, but my first impression was that it's just stupid. TPTB need to decide on ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #12
Toyota must be happy... KurtNYC Sep 2014 #16
Something like fadedrose Sep 2014 #19
Be patient, we're still focus testing n/t whatchamacallit Sep 2014 #20
ISIS is Islamic State of Iraq and Syria fadedrose Sep 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We have yet another name ...»Reply #18