Krugman- Return of the "Bums on Welfare" [View all]
Thinking some more about John Boehners resurrection of the notion that were suffering weak job growth because people are living the good life on government benefits, and dont want to work. It has long seemed to me that the issue of unemployment benefits is where the debate over economic policy in a depression reaches its purest essence. If your on the right, you believe you more or less have to believe that unemployment benefits hurt job creation, because youre paying people not to work. To admit that depression conditions are different, that the economy is suffering from an overall lack of demand and that putting money into the pockets of people likely to spend it would increase employment, would mean admitting that the free market sometimes fails badly. And of course disdain for the unemployed helps a lot if you want to oppose any kind of aid for the unfortunate.
But theres something remarkable about seeing these claims made now because even if you believed that expanded unemployment benefits were somehow a cause rather than an effect of the economic crisis, those expanded benefits are long gone. Heres unemployment benefits as a percentage of GDP:

Theyre back down to their level at the height of the Bush boom.
And here, from Josh Bivens, is the recipiency rate the percentage of the unemployed receiving any benefits at all:

more
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/return-of-the-bums-on-welfare/?smid=re-share