Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I grant Ms. Watson's point. Still. [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)34. i think you are incorrect. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
men, that really have no interest in changing status quo, telling feminists they need to
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#13
yep "you believe the assholes are the good guys who feminists should look to for inspiration. " LOL
bettyellen
Sep 2014
#57
i am going ot say the demoniation is beyond the mra and limbaughs. it is the fear of change.
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#30
my husband is a gamer as all those that play with him, and none are feminists. they reject
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#83
my republican hiusband is more feminist than most all men on the board and still he does not accept
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#85
yes. i have a repug hubby that voted kerry, and obama twice. and still, he defines himself as repug
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#88
he was never a fox news watcher. i think fox news is what put blinders on so many. and it was not
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#95
yes. many men do. daily. here on du. they do not feel they have a target on their back, as
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#18
i do not feel he is addressing feminists and telling them how they are suppose to address issues,
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#22
Because you *agree* with him, not because he's not a *man*, *explaining*, to *women*...
Romulox
Sep 2014
#23
Nope. I read DU women who disagree with him on the original thread. He's a MANSPLAINER!!!!!
Romulox
Sep 2014
#28
I read it. He's disagreeing with Watson, and "mansplaining" why she's wrong--about feminism! nt
Romulox
Sep 2014
#32
It's not his job to interpret a woman's words for her or anybody else. It's textbook. nt
Romulox
Sep 2014
#62
you really are not getting hte concept of mansplaining. what i see you doing is reinforcing
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#31
Nonsense. You agree with him, and so give him a pass. The definition remains unchanged. nt
Romulox
Sep 2014
#33
in the thread. a man telling me why i am sex negative. why i must accept being called sex negative
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#37
using the word "apparent" allows us to understand you are not using the definition but are instead
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#74
i cannot stress how much i love your conversation and i will just post this reply
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#56
this is what i really appreciate from your post. this is the challenge. and this is what
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#71
i think how the poster interpreted the Op is off, i think. open to discussion. but...
seabeyond
Sep 2014
#70
Women and Men need to work together to change the Status Quo. Men need to speak up at every level
Tuesday Afternoon
Sep 2014
#67