General Discussion

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)

62. No ...

Reply to woo me with science (Reply #60)

Tue Sep 23, 2014, 07:20 PM

Sep 2014

you have specifically and repeatedly, incorrectly, stated that the SoL to bring an action has passed. My citing to the statute that indicates different, is most certainly, NOT a strawman argument.

What you are doing is the regular moving of the goal-post ... "DoJ can't do it. It's too late" ... "What they can?" ... "Well, they won't!" And you even slip in the, "Even if they do ... It won't be who I want prosecuted!"

I realize, this is your singular most important issue/complaint ... but the DoJ does have an obligation to ensure that when they go to court, they have a case they can win ... no matter how long it takes. You've heard the quote about "the wheels of justice ..." No?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ preparing criminal charges against Wall Street executives [View all] JaneyVee Sep 2014 OP

Cool! ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #1

Wasted on you I see madokie Sep 2014 #4

Quite the contrary and you have absolutely nothing on which to base that bit of rudeness. ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #8

Wasted on a lot of posters on DU I am afraid Andy823 Sep 2014 #11

Well, I am not one of those people. Yes, there are things he's done I don't agree with and ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #14

That's good to hear. Andy823 Sep 2014 #28

EXCELLENT post! calimary Sep 2014 #39

The usual way of handling these investigations, as you know, dixiegrrrrl Sep 2014 #46

couldn't have said it better myself madokie Sep 2014 #18

I agree with you. Andy823 Sep 2014 #29

Another EXCELLENT post. calimary Sep 2014 #37

hear, hear... Stellar Sep 2014 #69

Endless negativity Iliyah Sep 2014 #36

Perhaps not, if he is serious about "criminal" charges. malthaussen Sep 2014 #5

We'll see, Mal. Forgive me if I'm a bit cynical. Seem too many times they just get away with it ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #9

Oh, I'm with you there. malthaussen Sep 2014 #12

I don't know, this sounds new. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #15

While it could be new and not going back to the CDS scam, that was going on during the ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #17

I suspect this is getting investigated because it affects Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #19

LIBOR manipulation? Kensan Sep 2014 #32

They deliberately dragged their heels woo me with science Sep 2014 #34

We've gone over this ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #40

And the SOL on any number of them is five years. woo me with science Sep 2014 #52

Okay! One more response before you are proven ignorant on this topic ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #54

Oh....they've been case building? woo me with science Sep 2014 #55

And thus, bring us to my Post #47 ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #57

Well, you're trying to attribute motives to the administration woo me with science Sep 2014 #58

Be honest ... I've got no sell on anything, with you, ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #59

I talk about the administration's behavior and track record. woo me with science Sep 2014 #61

Yes, that sounds more recent. malthaussen Sep 2014 #20

The SoL on any number of these financial crimes are up to 10 years. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #38

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. n/t malthaussen Sep 2014 #44

LOL @ "on any number of" woo me with science Sep 2014 #49

I noticed you have avoided my Post #42 ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #50

What does that have to do with woo me with science Sep 2014 #53

Nothing ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #56

You better believe it! zappaman Sep 2014 #67

Kickin' Faux pas Sep 2014 #2

Which will pay a fine and which one will hire Holder to their board? NightWatcher Sep 2014 #3

Who wrote this P.R. piece? Wellstone ruled Sep 2014 #6

I am expecting to hear some very good news in this department LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #7

Silliness? Marr Sep 2014 #22

But he has been going after the big banks. Did you read? LawDeeDah Sep 2014 #25

+1. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #41

That remains to be seen. Marr Sep 2014 #48

Encouraging But.... colsohlibgal Sep 2014 #10

I agree. nm rhett o rick Sep 2014 #13

About frackin time. Baitball Blogger Sep 2014 #16

I'll reserve comment until I see who they arrest, if anyone. Marr Sep 2014 #21

I love the concept. 99Forever Sep 2014 #23

Historically, only low-level people go to jail; the upper level people closeupready Sep 2014 #24

Why now? sadoldgirl Sep 2014 #26

When I see mug shots, I'll be impressed. n/t ColesCountyDem Sep 2014 #27

Sounds good, but... ReRe Sep 2014 #30

The statutes of limitations were already expiring in 2012 for many of the crimes. woo me with science Sep 2014 #31

Why don't you go to the actual statute? ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #42

See posts 52 and 53. woo me with science Sep 2014 #60

No ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #62

Oh my word. woo me with science Sep 2014 #63

I hope they can ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #64

The Feds found some Wall St. executivs who are NOT part of "THE FAMILY," to make an example of. blkmusclmachine Sep 2014 #33

Yeah. A year after the Statute of Limitations ran out on Control Fraud. Octafish Sep 2014 #35

See Post #42. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #43

Good one! Thanks! Octafish Sep 2014 #45

I really love Dr. Black; however, ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #47

Dr. Black isn't from another era. He's a forensic economist. Octafish Sep 2014 #70

When I said ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2014 #71

Yum, bankers. littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #51

secrets in the sauce questionseverything Sep 2014 #65

I Want To Keep My Fingers Crossed... ChiciB1 Sep 2014 #66

Those are some very nice words, strung together that say so much but Glassunion Sep 2014 #68