Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)
38. You sooooooo wish
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 08:39 PM
Sep 2014

but, one day, really, you'll have enough self confidence not to try and control the language of the world around you.

When you grow up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uh this calling Hillary Clinton "Grandma" is sounding more and more sexist to me.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #1
I'm NOT a fan of Hillary, but I agree tkmorris Sep 2014 #2
Grandma is no different than mother or father in our culture. CK_John Sep 2014 #8
bullshit...not how you just used it.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #11
Here ya go mate tkmorris Sep 2014 #17
He can start with the bullshit posts demwing Sep 2014 #30
I am not a big Hillary fan, but that reminds me of how some peope emphasize Obama's middle name. ohnoyoudidnt Sep 2014 #21
So, hypothetically, if Bernie Sanders were to have a new grandson Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #33
Sounds like wishful dreaming - not reality. Lil Missy Sep 2014 #3
I don't think so. Taking the Senate is one thing, but it doesn't insure napi21 Sep 2014 #4
Oh for GAWD'S SAKE Glitterati Sep 2014 #5
May not be sexist CanonRay Sep 2014 #7
It's NEITHER Glitterati Sep 2014 #15
Sexist? Arguable. Definitely rude and childish though tkmorris Sep 2014 #9
We are? demwing Sep 2014 #32
When have you heard of a Democratic candidate referred to as Grandpa? pnwmom Sep 2014 #10
they haven't.....and that is what proves its meant derogatorily.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #13
Grandpa McCain Glitterati Sep 2014 #19
And McCain is not a Democrat....I guarantee you the Rightwingers do not call him that.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #23
Grandma and Grandpa are GREAT terms of endearment Glitterati Sep 2014 #25
we refer to mccain as granpa to ridicule him, in Hillary's case the way it was used IS SEXIST JI7 Sep 2014 #27
Wrong Glitterati Sep 2014 #28
bzzzzzt yourself.....he was SPOT ON with that comment....we DO call McCain Gramps VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #34
You sooooooo wish Glitterati Sep 2014 #38
No, it isn't. demwing Sep 2014 #35
It's sexist, divisive, and over-the-top to refer to the first female Secretary of State as Grandma. pnwmom Sep 2014 #6
Nothing to fix. CK_John Sep 2014 #12
This 65 year old grandfather agrees! nt Atticus Sep 2014 #20
it is fucking Sexist, Romney, McCain, Cheney , Biden etc were all Grandpas JI7 Sep 2014 #14
Actually, I did for 3 of the 4. Chan790 Sep 2014 #40
Elizabeth Warren has 3 grandchildren. zappaman Sep 2014 #43
What??? former9thward Sep 2014 #16
The Senate will only confirm ultra conservatives and deals will be made prior CK_John Sep 2014 #24
NO way. Certainly not Thomas or Scalia. (nt) enough Sep 2014 #18
I'm not Secretary Clinton's greatest fan, but do NOT call her "Grandma." The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2014 #22
I don't accept your dictorial bull shit. CK_John Sep 2014 #26
What is "dictorial"? I don't know that word. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2014 #29
Oh is that your way of saying "politically correct"? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #37
and THAT proves HOW bad it has become here....how sure they are feeling about denigrating this VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #31
I'm not a Hillary fan at all LondonReign2 Sep 2014 #44
You are aware that Clarence Thomas isn't all that old, right? Chan790 Sep 2014 #36
"Also, it's possible Grandma will bypass a 2016 run and stay home and do grandma things." zappaman Sep 2014 #39
This thread gives me some hope. I figure since your posts are about as accurate as Bill Kristol's Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2014 #41
Oh, my bad. I didn't realize you were referring to Elizabeth Warren! zappaman Sep 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #38