General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Whigs... for a couple years I have written here [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)In the 1850's, the Whig leadership that chose the candidates had a cautious, don't-rock-the-boat mentality. There was no place for the abolitionists to go except to form a new party.
These days, such widespread discontent would lead to successful primary challenges to established party favorites. This happened with the Tea Party in 2010. Sometimes (as with the ouster of Senator Bob Bennett) the insurgents succeed in putting one of their own in office. Sometimes (as with the Senate nominations of Sharron Angle and Christine O'Donnell) the insurgent wins the primary, but with a resulting loss in the general election. Sometimes (as in Chuck DeVore's loss of the Senate primary to Carly Fiorina) the insurgent doesn't even win the primary. Generally, though, it's now easier for dissidents to try to take over one of the established major parties than it would be to try to start a new one.