Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(51,666 posts)

10. He should be fired, tarred and feathered, and run out of town on a rail.

Tue Oct 14, 2014, 05:51 PM

Oct 2014

After a day in the stocks having rotten tomatoes lobbed at him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

wouldn't that be discrimination by the State ? JI7 Oct 2014 #1

Why yes, it would. His job is not his personal church. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #9

Done. Public employees serve the public, period. arcane1 Oct 2014 #2

The first reply has it HereSince1628 Oct 2014 #4

Done. City Lights Oct 2014 #5

He should be fired, tarred and feathered, and run out of town on a rail. kestrel91316 Oct 2014 #10

Of course not -- magistrates are not clergypeople rocktivity Oct 2014 #7

Wow. 96% believe they should be allowed to refuse?? theHandpuppet Oct 2014 #8

If this is the same poll as was featured on Joe My God dsc Oct 2014 #12

Not just no ... emphatically no etherealtruth Oct 2014 #11

Done, but still at 94 to 6 panader0 Oct 2014 #13

Same for me. Bonx Oct 2014 #14