General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)I am not upset by discussions of ebola and quarantines.
I am, however, frustrated by particular individuals who continue to repeat falsehoods despite evidence being shown to them multiple times. And I will vehemently counter those falsehoods, because we can't have a proper discussion without recognizing the difference between myth and fact, can we?
It isn't about emotional reactions, like whether or not forced quarantine is "horrible and disgusting". It is about what is best for public health. And using facts, rather than emotions or myths, demonstrates that forced quarantines are not only medically unnecessary, they may actually work against protecting public health.
Vitriol is defined as "cruel & bitter criticism". If you think pointing out facts in the face of falsehoods is cruel and bitter, that's your issue, not mine. In my opinion, repeating falsehoods in the face of facts and evidence is a far worse habit, particularly after a month or so of active discussion on the topic when the myths have been debunked.