Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PC overkill on this forum [View all]DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)153. “But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” ~George Orwell, 1984
Like the man says, it gets worse with every generation. The more we soften reality, the less we're capable of seeing it clearly. We've learned to avoid the hard parts of life through our words. Or lack of them. By any other name, they're called lies. Living lies.
Explicit words -- words that don't hide anything from the hearer -- words, as plain as day -- is what we now require if we are to break this spiral of decent and take control of the momentum of our direction.
- Or, we can keep using JP Morgan's and Goldman Sach's half-assed broken-down tools to fix the planet. Because it's worked so well, right? I mean look where it's gotten so far.
Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious. ~George Orwell, 1984
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
167 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think there should be a limit to the number of times you can alert on a post.
alphafemale
Oct 2014
#2
The point is that overraction is silly and it makes us look stupid and it's not helpful.
NYC_SKP
Oct 2014
#11
i think it is a proquarantine or christie going after posts because christie is such a weasel
seabeyond
Oct 2014
#55
"The point is that overraction is silly and it makes us look stupid and it's not helpful."
NCTraveler
Oct 2014
#92
Fully agree with you on your points and even stated as much in another reply of mine.
NCTraveler
Oct 2014
#157
It would be helpful if you would publish the entire thing, and let us decide for ourselves.
Sheldon Cooper
Oct 2014
#8
i think it was an alert from proquarantine, pro christie, pissed cause christie is getting trashed.
seabeyond
Oct 2014
#59
That's not what the alert said. It did not claim that the term "redhead" was a slur.
Skinner
Oct 2014
#88
I think Skinner point is that the alerter meant that referring to her hair color when it
tblue37
Oct 2014
#155
Yeah, but always with 'stepchild', ie the fact that 'redhead' was involved at all
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2014
#122
i dont think it had anything to do with sexism, but dissing christie and someone didnt like that. nt
seabeyond
Oct 2014
#126
I will take your word for it. I didn't read the thread yet, only what Skinner posted on this thread.
merrily
Oct 2014
#130
Maybe originally, but there is a connotation now. And "fire crotch" seems based solely on hair color
merrily
Oct 2014
#131
Kaci Hickox's boyfriend, Ted Wilbur, a nursing student in Fort Kent, Maine, said
NYC_SKP
Oct 2014
#15
What a dumbass alert! And it's a quote from Hickox's boyfriend! Jeez, some people...SMH! nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Oct 2014
#19
or if proquarantine, pro christies and christies is getting his ass handed to him, it is used
seabeyond
Oct 2014
#65
PC has been killing this site for a while. There's even been efforts to eliminate the word "fuck".
L0oniX
Oct 2014
#20
Yes, I realize that. Personally, I think I know the difference between
TreasonousBastard
Oct 2014
#78
or a person starting an OP on pc, or members bemoaning pc on du, with a 7-0 verdict
seabeyond
Oct 2014
#74
99% of the time I'm called for a jury, it's a stupid-ass alert. It's rather disappointing.
arcane1
Oct 2014
#21
Heh. I had one hidden for saying something nice about someone, but...
TreasonousBastard
Oct 2014
#24
seems to me that a vote of 7-0 in favor of keeping it indicates there is *not* PC overkill
fishwax
Oct 2014
#30
I believe an alerter who is shot down 7-0 loses alerting privileges for some period of time. (nt)
Nye Bevan
Oct 2014
#45
It's an anonymous message board. There's no guarantee that a single poster is "on the left".
CJCRANE
Oct 2014
#64
they were probably trying to give "PC" a bad name, and screw with the poster. Both happen here,
bettyellen
Oct 2014
#52
WHAAAAT?! The word "redhead" is a perfectly fine and harmless word, like "brunette"! WTH?! Idiots!!
WinkyDink
Oct 2014
#54
You're turn a frivolous alert by a single member into "PC overkill on this forum"...
SidDithers
Oct 2014
#56
and we have a crazy uncle site that states they leave du window open to alert and serve
seabeyond
Oct 2014
#75
But the terms are all so arbitrary. It's hard to keep up with the Okay-Not Okay status
valerief
Oct 2014
#118
Yes, I did get that from your post and I agree. Wording is not the issue. Bigotry is.
merrily
Oct 2014
#127
I hope all jurors bashed the alerter, since they could do so anonymously and without risking a reply
merrily
Oct 2014
#108
Hah! I just had it happen to me! Served on a jury where I noted the "offending" post and my
calimary
Oct 2014
#139
“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” ~George Orwell, 1984
DeSwiss
Oct 2014
#153
Exactly. It's the intention of the speaker and the context that makes words good or bad.
merrily
Oct 2014
#159
Perhaps if one has too many alerts that are rejected by the jury they
The Green Manalishi
Oct 2014
#160
K&R for a needed discussion. The term "redhead" was used by her boyfriend, quoted in media
uppityperson
Oct 2014
#166