General Discussion

BumRushDaShow

(170,206 posts)

5. "They will...allow the Republican agenda to move forward."

Wed Nov 5, 2014, 08:02 AM

Nov 2014

only to have it vetoed with not enough votes to override, so it will go nowhere.

The fact that the President has only carried out 2 vetoes (and I think one was a pocket veto) was because the crap never made it to his desk due to his explicit threats of a veto.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If anyone thinks Dems will filibuster [View all] santroy79 Nov 2014 OP

BINGO! B Calm Nov 2014 #1

I agree JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #2

Yep newfie11 Nov 2014 #3

It's going to be a horrible, horrible two years...... a kennedy Nov 2014 #4

It's going to be worse when a Repub president is elected. I don't know where to move. nt valerief Nov 2014 #23

Not going to happen.... daleanime Nov 2014 #41

Because? After all, it's happened before, all too often. nt valerief Nov 2014 #42

It is of course just my opinion..... daleanime Nov 2014 #47

I don't understand. They do shit and get elected anyway. nt valerief Nov 2014 #49

You don't understand... daleanime Nov 2014 #50

I don't understand why you think that. valerief Nov 2014 #58

I'm thinking Saskatoon!!! n/t ewagner Nov 2014 #25

No, it's not. It's going to remain about the same. cleanhippie Nov 2014 #43

"They will...allow the Republican agenda to move forward." BumRushDaShow Nov 2014 #5

Do you REALLY believe that Obama will veto? Bohunk68 Nov 2014 #8

Keep trying BumRushDaShow Nov 2014 #29

What about the looming TPP ??? Plucketeer Nov 2014 #44

It looms like BumRushDaShow Nov 2014 #56

Well, personally I think the TPP is a decent idea Recursion Nov 2014 #68

In almost 6 years he has used the veto pen a total Bohunk68 Nov 2014 #59

Think about what you just wrote BumRushDaShow Nov 2014 #60

You have no examples to show for your assertion. Bohunk68 Nov 2014 #61

Try this BumRushDaShow Nov 2014 #69

Yeah... when Congress doesn't pass anything vetos are rare (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #67

This Congress could eat a hill of beans, and they still wouldn't be able to pass a healthy fart!! Major Hogwash Nov 2014 #70

yup PFunk Nov 2014 #6

Already happened AtlasProg Nov 2014 #34

Who's our Koch Brothers? Who will buy the media for the deprogramming? No one. nt valerief Nov 2014 #46

I would not be so quick or so generous as to hand out lofty-sounding excuses pre-emptively. merrily Nov 2014 #7

so they need 60 votes to end a filibuster by Warren, Franken, Sanders, etc? zazen Nov 2014 #9

Well , maybe not the Dem's, but Bernie might Filibuster bahrbearian Nov 2014 #10

Both parties are the same so it doesn't really matter. JoePhilly Nov 2014 #11

When the f*ck will Dems learn they cannot succeed as "GOP Lite?" Vinca Nov 2014 #12

When they're no longer paid to do so. Barack_America Nov 2014 #17

Sadly true. nt Nay Nov 2014 #20

Beat them with facts Pantagruelsmember Nov 2014 #45

cons will eliminate the filibuster belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #13

Reid eliminated the filibuster a year ago (EDIT: I was wrong) Recursion Nov 2014 #15

only on judicial nominations other than scotus picks belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #16

You think McConnell will care? Recursion Nov 2014 #21

no i think he'll end the filibuster like i said to which you said belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #24

Reid did not end the filibuster Bandit Nov 2014 #55

The Democrats filibustered pretty well from 2002-2006 Recursion Nov 2014 #63

This message was self-deleted by its author pa28 Nov 2014 #62

Thank you. I completely remembered that wrong Recursion Nov 2014 #64

Saw somebody had pointed that out and deleted. pa28 Nov 2014 #65

Totally fair. I misremembered the scope of the ruling Recursion Nov 2014 #66

Alzheimers for all ... GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #14

And I believe in the power of the veto pen Liberalynn Nov 2014 #18

Oh, I agree. Why would they stop rolling over for the Pubs now? nt Nay Nov 2014 #19

Wow Lippythelion69 Nov 2014 #22

Don't forget, in the next election cycle... Bettie Nov 2014 #26

I suspect you're wrong.. just took google.. Cha Nov 2014 #30

I hope I'm wrong Bettie Nov 2014 #31

I'm so sorry.. I've been feeling really bad for all the Cha Nov 2014 #33

Thanks Bettie Nov 2014 #35

.. Cha Nov 2014 #39

Well, no, the next election cycle is Presidential with 23 GOP Senate seats up Recursion Nov 2014 #40

Too often they remind me of this old Mr Fish toon... spedtr90 Nov 2014 #27

Reid has already promised to cooperate and submit to Republicans' willpower. TRoN33 Nov 2014 #28

I think I'd prefer if they didn't filibuster. sybylla Nov 2014 #32

I agree. Nothing is going to change until Hotler Nov 2014 #38

That happened in 2003 and yet we are still occupying Iraq. arcane1 Nov 2014 #53

exactly librechik Nov 2014 #36

well yeah, I suppose so Douglas Carpenter Nov 2014 #37

My 18 y.o. son dotymed Nov 2014 #48

Occasionally.. kentuck Nov 2014 #51

No. But, we can expect a lot of excuses why they didn't/don't. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #52

They'd have to find a spine for that. Le Taz Hot Nov 2014 #54

The caving-in-earnest really began under Reagan... villager Nov 2014 #57