Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama today: "Keystone, I just consider as one small aspect of a broader trend that’s really positiv [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)40. And a couple paragraphs before that ...
He laid out his parameters for Keystone approve ... parameters that your paragraph, along with the paragraph immediately preceding the one you (and the OP pick) points out that Keystone can't meet.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama today: "Keystone, I just consider as one small aspect of a broader trend that’s really positiv [View all]
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
OP
Yesterday was a big day for conservatives. Now they will get their fracking, TPP, and XL Pipelines.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#47
But he supports the TPP, right? Now it can be fast tracked thru the Senate just like he wants.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#66
Yes I was. He is letting the pipeline "play out". Not sure what that means to
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#122
Why would you expect him to veto these? He is a supporter. He sees eye to eye with
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#65
This has nothing to do with what I think. I asked you why you think he might
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#89
You mention the veto pen. I am saying that he won't use a veto pen for those
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#93
We better hope that the Republicans don't bring up cutting SS or Medicare. Just sayin'. nm
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#95
We will see our Conservative President have a field day with the new Conservative Senate.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#116
He's not running for office again - will he get put on the Koch's board? or what? nt
el_bryanto
Nov 2014
#30
Are you new to politics? How will Eric Holder make money off of giving Wall Street
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#49
It's re-posting his own statement, and they are classifying the presidents statement as "anti-Obama"
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#15
Of course he's playing politics. He's going to "study" it to death. I've always thought so. nt
Hekate
Nov 2014
#114
No. He just referred to it as positive. And he referred to tar sands as "oil", which it isn't. For
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#13
Of course not. Obama has been dithering on this since it started, hoping it goes away
Recursion
Nov 2014
#16
One last time. Obama said exactly what the poster said that you guys are all saying is a lie.
Autumn
Nov 2014
#44
Guess it all comes down to what you believe. What Obama said or what Obama said.
Autumn
Nov 2014
#74
Thanks for providing the full quote. After 6 years, it still hasn't gone through. Amazing, no?
Hekate
Nov 2014
#113
Obama is our last line of defense at this point. Doesn't look good. Shocking
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#17
Do you think those that are opposed to fracking and the XL Pipeline are "DU's
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#92
There is nothing below about dogs and cats living together. Help me find the
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#99
And you think the concerns are unfounded? Do you really think the XL Pipeline wont get
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#106
"think the GOP will force him to pass it?" --signed, the sort of Dem who thinks we're out of Iraq
MisterP
Nov 2014
#46
I heard that but am hoping he was reeferring to the prefacing of Canada's Keystone.
glinda
Nov 2014
#48
It would have eliminated all doubt had he just said a clear "NO" about Keystone. eom
BP2
Nov 2014
#51
I never would have believed in my wildest dreams about President Obama but here goes:
Brigid
Nov 2014
#60