Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama today: "Keystone, I just consider as one small aspect of a broader trend that’s really positiv [View all]randome
(34,845 posts)91. You didn't read the full exchange. See post #28.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama today: "Keystone, I just consider as one small aspect of a broader trend that’s really positiv [View all]
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
OP
Yesterday was a big day for conservatives. Now they will get their fracking, TPP, and XL Pipelines.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#47
But he supports the TPP, right? Now it can be fast tracked thru the Senate just like he wants.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#66
Yes I was. He is letting the pipeline "play out". Not sure what that means to
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#122
Why would you expect him to veto these? He is a supporter. He sees eye to eye with
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#65
This has nothing to do with what I think. I asked you why you think he might
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#89
You mention the veto pen. I am saying that he won't use a veto pen for those
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#93
We better hope that the Republicans don't bring up cutting SS or Medicare. Just sayin'. nm
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#95
We will see our Conservative President have a field day with the new Conservative Senate.
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#116
He's not running for office again - will he get put on the Koch's board? or what? nt
el_bryanto
Nov 2014
#30
Are you new to politics? How will Eric Holder make money off of giving Wall Street
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#49
It's re-posting his own statement, and they are classifying the presidents statement as "anti-Obama"
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#15
Of course he's playing politics. He's going to "study" it to death. I've always thought so. nt
Hekate
Nov 2014
#114
No. He just referred to it as positive. And he referred to tar sands as "oil", which it isn't. For
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#13
Of course not. Obama has been dithering on this since it started, hoping it goes away
Recursion
Nov 2014
#16
One last time. Obama said exactly what the poster said that you guys are all saying is a lie.
Autumn
Nov 2014
#44
Guess it all comes down to what you believe. What Obama said or what Obama said.
Autumn
Nov 2014
#74
Thanks for providing the full quote. After 6 years, it still hasn't gone through. Amazing, no?
Hekate
Nov 2014
#113
Obama is our last line of defense at this point. Doesn't look good. Shocking
grahamhgreen
Nov 2014
#17
Do you think those that are opposed to fracking and the XL Pipeline are "DU's
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#92
There is nothing below about dogs and cats living together. Help me find the
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#99
And you think the concerns are unfounded? Do you really think the XL Pipeline wont get
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#106
"think the GOP will force him to pass it?" --signed, the sort of Dem who thinks we're out of Iraq
MisterP
Nov 2014
#46
I heard that but am hoping he was reeferring to the prefacing of Canada's Keystone.
glinda
Nov 2014
#48
It would have eliminated all doubt had he just said a clear "NO" about Keystone. eom
BP2
Nov 2014
#51
I never would have believed in my wildest dreams about President Obama but here goes:
Brigid
Nov 2014
#60