Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The third way have already decided whom we are purging [View all]Autumn
(45,058 posts)1. Nature abhors a vacuum. That vacuum the democratic party has created will be filled.
It remains to be seen who will fill it. Recommended
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nature abhors a vacuum. That vacuum the democratic party has created will be filled.
Autumn
Nov 2014
#1
I no longer believe they are pro women, pro minorities, pro Gay, other than to use these issues
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#6
Howard Dean had the way to get voters to the booth but Obama fired him first thing, so not sure
Hestia
Nov 2014
#7
I saw the claim yesterday that the good Dr is going to be working for Hillary
hootinholler
Nov 2014
#12
You are waaaay out there in the weeds, mired in specificity, and really really pissed off.
Avalux
Nov 2014
#14
Really? Oh they did come out in 2008 full of hope as we all were. But that was the last time. They
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#21
now you have two things to provide evidence for, but you won't because you can't
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#52
All the evidence needed to be labeled a "commie" was desire for better working conditions
bhikkhu
Nov 2014
#34
So what you're saying is the 'progressive' fear of 'Third Way' is like McCarthy's fear of commies.
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#35
getting evidence from 'progressives' is like pulling teeth. Look at the OP again
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#50
Interesting you would use court room terminology to deny the need for evidence.
wyldwolf
Nov 2014
#66
If you're using the term "evidence", it implies that you've assigned yourself a jurisprudential
Ken Burch
Nov 2014
#67