Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Offshoring is all about excluding American workers from the job market. Plain and simple. [View all]antigop
(12,778 posts)2. Clinton's free-trade advocacy is hitting labor where it lives
http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/30/nation/na-buffalo30
Clinton is successfully wooing wealthy Indian Americans, many of them business leaders with close ties to their native country and an interest in protecting outsourcing laws and expanding access to worker visas. Her campaign has held three fundraisers in the Indian American community recently, one of which raised close to $3 million, its sponsor told an Indian news organization.
But in Buffalo, the fruits of the Tata deal have been hard to find. The company, which called the arrangement Clinton's "brainchild," says "about 10" employees work here. Tata says most of the new employees were hired from around Buffalo. It declines to say whether any of the new jobs are held by foreigners, who make up 90% of Tata's 10,000-employee workforce in the United States.
As for the research deal with the state university that Clinton announced, school administrators say that three attempts to win government grants with Tata for health-oriented research were unsuccessful and that no projects are imminent.
The Tata deal underscores Clinton's bind as she attempts to lead a Democratic Party that is turning away from the free-trade policies of her husband's administration in the 1990s and is becoming more skeptical of trade deals and temporary-worker visas.
Like many businesses and economists, Clinton says that the United States benefits by admitting high-tech workers from abroad. She backs proposals to increase the number of temporary visas for skilled foreigners.
Clinton is successfully wooing wealthy Indian Americans, many of them business leaders with close ties to their native country and an interest in protecting outsourcing laws and expanding access to worker visas. Her campaign has held three fundraisers in the Indian American community recently, one of which raised close to $3 million, its sponsor told an Indian news organization.
But in Buffalo, the fruits of the Tata deal have been hard to find. The company, which called the arrangement Clinton's "brainchild," says "about 10" employees work here. Tata says most of the new employees were hired from around Buffalo. It declines to say whether any of the new jobs are held by foreigners, who make up 90% of Tata's 10,000-employee workforce in the United States.
As for the research deal with the state university that Clinton announced, school administrators say that three attempts to win government grants with Tata for health-oriented research were unsuccessful and that no projects are imminent.
The Tata deal underscores Clinton's bind as she attempts to lead a Democratic Party that is turning away from the free-trade policies of her husband's administration in the 1990s and is becoming more skeptical of trade deals and temporary-worker visas.
Like many businesses and economists, Clinton says that the United States benefits by admitting high-tech workers from abroad. She backs proposals to increase the number of temporary visas for skilled foreigners.
edit: deleted paragraphs because excerpt was too long
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Offshoring is all about excluding American workers from the job market. Plain and simple. [View all]
Zalatix
Apr 2012
OP
Professor Norm Matloff's H-1B web page: H-1B work visa is fundamentally about cheap labor
antigop
Apr 2012
#34
In my opinion, the Clintons are probably personally profiting from their business ties
JDPriestly
Apr 2012
#9
Well, technically that is the policy. H1B'rs supposedly provide unique qualifications..
DCBob
Apr 2012
#11
H-1Bs aren't indentured servants. They're paid the prevailing wage & can change employers at will.
leveymg
Apr 2012
#23
Wrong. Once a new petition is filed, an H-1B worker can "port" to his next job.
leveymg
Apr 2012
#25
Are you an H-1B worker or someone with working knowledge of nonimmigrant visas?
leveymg
Apr 2012
#28
The $52K is the lowest of a 4-level wage system - entry level, no exper. $96K is the mean wage paid
leveymg
Apr 2012
#45
Your premise is wrong: US has long enjoyed a net surplus in trade in services, unlike manufacturing
leveymg
Apr 2012
#21
Your graph shows a HUGE loss of manufacturing jobs and a SMALL rise in service jobs
Zalatix
Apr 2012
#32
First part is right - services steady, massive deindustrialization. But, service exports are
leveymg
Apr 2012
#33
Where are the jobs for the tons of Americans who can't get into those few "highly paid" service jobs
Zalatix
Apr 2012
#35
Those manufacturing jobs have been offshored, and the savings pocketed by the 1%
leveymg
Apr 2012
#36
H-1B doesn't discriminate any more than US service workers abroad discriminate against Indonesians.
leveymg
Apr 2012
#38
That article is from June of 2007. Underpayment of H-1Bs has not been a recent, widespread problem.
leveymg
Apr 2012
#56
2007? You think that companies aren't still trying to find cheap labor this way?
Zalatix
Apr 2012
#57
And from the product after they ruin our environment running it to the water to ship it to China.
lonestarnot
Apr 2012
#40
it's a deliberate strip mining of our populous' wealth for the time the elites choose to flee
NuttyFluffers
Apr 2012
#42
OK, we should credit the BNP with coming up with that slogan (at least the British version of it).
pampango
Apr 2012
#44
dispite the saleble words whats it like sharing the same platform as the right?
Sea-Dog
Apr 2012
#51
And yet *you* are the one who shares an economic ideology with rightwing think-tanks CATO and ALEC.
Romulox
Apr 2012
#52