General Discussion

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)

14. I agree, and would like to see a few other improvements.

Fri Nov 21, 2014, 04:09 PM

Nov 2014

A process for appeal wouldn't be too hard to enact.

A limit on the number of alerts that a member can make should be established.

In addition to blocking jurors, we should be able to block particular members from alerting.

It's just gotten silly, people baiting and alerting then "grave dancing" in the thread where a post is hidden.

It's bullshit, enabled by administrators who have abdicated responsibility for maintaining civility.

Still the best political site, but not as good as it was before juries, IMHO.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Nov 2014 OP

Worst idea ever, anonymous juries. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #1

There needs to be a two/thirds majority requirement to hide, IMO MohRokTah Nov 2014 #5

So it would not have been hidden anyway. nt rogerashton Nov 2014 #12

I agree, and would like to see a few other improvements. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #14

Yup. For sure. HERVEPA Nov 2014 #6

pat them on the heads for bemusement, but don't feed them-- the dogmatic love attention. LanternWaste Nov 2014 #2

Nah. Just a lot of clueless people on the juries, who think it's OK to let almost anything stand. HERVEPA Nov 2014 #3

Not only he is a known Putin shill.. R3druM Nov 2014 #4

Says the sock. nt. NCTraveler Nov 2014 #11

My latest vice is gingerbread flavored beer Capt. Obvious Nov 2014 #7

I'll stick with ginger beer. moriah Nov 2014 #16

Yes. tenderfoot Nov 2014 #8

IBTL. NCTraveler Nov 2014 #9

One word.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #10

Nyet, Tovarisch. nt Xipe Totec Nov 2014 #13

Tsk. Tsk. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #15