Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't think they're all lying either. cali Nov 2014 #1
Would like to hear from Cosby Show cast brush Nov 2014 #28
I don't want to believe it but it cannot be ignored. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #38
What I don't understand is why there is even a Statute of Limitations on rape or sexual assualt still_one Nov 2014 #2
I never understood that either TorchTheWitch Nov 2014 #4
Statute of limitations on rape: TinkerTot55 Nov 2014 #6
See post #8. joshcryer Nov 2014 #9
Perhaps to prevent backlog? Helen Borg Nov 2014 #7
Limitation statutes, while disagreeable, are for proper defense. joshcryer Nov 2014 #8
there is no limitation on murder still_one Nov 2014 #29
Becomes more and more difficult to prove as time goes on davidn3600 Nov 2014 #10
That's a practical limitation that doesn't require a statute. (nt) stone space Nov 2014 #51
Because exact facts matter, and memories fade. Dreamer Tatum Nov 2014 #55
Agreed but people are having a hard time thinking of "america's dad" as rapist Liberal_in_LA Nov 2014 #3
America's dad isn't a rapist. tavernier Nov 2014 #13
I don't want to believe this Droning Predator Nov 2014 #5
I've never been a perverted celebrity, but I think the odds are better then you think Exultant Democracy Nov 2014 #11
Totally bullshit post. You should be ashamed. HERVEPA Nov 2014 #26
What is bullshit and what should I be ashamed of? Exultant Democracy Nov 2014 #35
I'll just leave this here d_b Nov 2014 #12
The "strikingly similar" evidence rule in law is very difficult to meet...not so much in the Fred Sanders Nov 2014 #14
so you're strongly opposed to anyone finding Officer Wilson culpable in cali Nov 2014 #27
Finding...culpable. Define each, dearee? Fred Sanders Nov 2014 #30
gee, freddykins, you don't know what culpable means? cali Nov 2014 #31
Everyone around DU understands your childish condescending posts, Cali, it is always amusing. Fred Sanders Nov 2014 #32
sorry, fred, I wasn't one of the chicken littles re ebola. cali Nov 2014 #34
That was a nasty thing to say NM_Birder Nov 2014 #53
this is a bit off topic maybe, but as you seem to have some idea what it means... HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #39
Character evidence by the prosecution is not admissible. An unrelated accusation is considered Fred Sanders Nov 2014 #41
thanks HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #42
I have to agree Yavin. NaturalHigh Nov 2014 #15
Zero, and we all know that, even though some try to deny it (nt) Nye Bevan Nov 2014 #16
Must feel great to be so sure of yourself elias7 Nov 2014 #17
You mean like this case...... Logical Nov 2014 #18
Yeah, because grown women claiming that they were drugged and raped XemaSab Nov 2014 #19
Hmmmmm...if so obvious crazy then explain the YEARS of trials. nt Logical Nov 2014 #20
Easy enough - Satanic Panic. moriah Nov 2014 #25
In that case, the toddlers were co-located and coerced into their testimony Yavin4 Nov 2014 #23
His accusers have nothing to gain by this Generic Brad Nov 2014 #21
Michelle Hurd's story is very ctaylors6 Nov 2014 #22
I would say exactly the same odds as a bunch of kids lying about Michael Jackson. CBGLuthier Nov 2014 #24
Remember the McMartin day care case? cwydro Nov 2014 #33
Grown women claiming they were drugged, raped = toddlers claiming they were abused, saw witches, uppityperson Nov 2014 #36
You cannot possibly be that naive cwydro Nov 2014 #43
Yes, that is what I meant. Comparing coached toddlers to a bunch of abused women is appalling. uppityperson Nov 2014 #44
Of couse they won't rememeber that. Exultant Democracy Nov 2014 #37
I am curious, have you ever been a victim of a crime, or sexual abuse? uppityperson Nov 2014 #46
In the realm of theoretically possible but not remotely plausible. LittleBlue Nov 2014 #40
That would depend if their stories Shankapotomus Nov 2014 #45
That reasoning assumes independence of action HereSince1628 Nov 2014 #47
As I mentioned in the other thread: Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #48
Oh come on. It could be worse. Kablooie Nov 2014 #49
What are the odds of thousands of white men who claim that Obama is malaise Nov 2014 #50
Indeed. maced666 Nov 2014 #52
I guess my main question remaining is: Tommy_Carcetti Nov 2014 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What are the odds that 13...»Reply #7