Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

merrily

(45,251 posts)
17. Bullshit. It was a bizarre, unprecedented grand jury proceeding and expert after expert
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 09:05 AM
Nov 2014

has said that releasing the info does not equal transparency because you can't tell things like emphasis, etc.

The only conclusion to which I jumped as soon as I heard this was that Wilson would get off; and it was highly advisable to jump to that conclusion. It's what almost always happens and it happened in this instance. Anyone who does not find that the least bit fishy needs help. A lot of help.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed [View all] Post removed Nov 2014 OP
Wow B Calm Nov 2014 #1
Oh well, alright then. Sheldon Cooper Nov 2014 #2
I saw JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #4
How do you know what was presented JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #3
NYT link to documents released ctaylors6 Nov 2014 #6
So you and I who have not read this JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #12
I'm sorry I wasn't trying ctaylors6 Nov 2014 #19
But you made a point JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #22
Just Another Gen was not accusing you of trying to make a point. merrily Nov 2014 #29
Didnt they release a 1000 page doccume t of what was presented? Travis_0004 Nov 2014 #7
I agree JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #13
The prosecutor is supposed to represent the deceased victim. it does not appear that merrily Nov 2014 #31
That settles it. Mira Nov 2014 #5
Yeppers! JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #14
"The evidence" is nothing if it cannot be challenged, examined, refuted, analyzed UNDER OATH in a WinkyDink Nov 2014 #8
Precisely!! KeepItReal Nov 2014 #11
obvious is obvious Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #9
Nothing says transparency like a secret grand jury... BklnDem75 Nov 2014 #10
Enjoy your stay Katashi_itto Nov 2014 #15
but, the OP has a star. B Calm Nov 2014 #18
Hmmm... BklnDem75 Nov 2014 #26
These days, I doubt the OP would get a hide, much less a pizza. merrily Nov 2014 #25
Agree, but with just 42 posts. Then putting something like this out. Yeah.... Katashi_itto Nov 2014 #30
its a sad, fxstc Nov 2014 #16
Please tell me you meant to include the sarcasm smilie. merrily Nov 2014 #20
Curious the way "low number posts" people show up. Vinca Nov 2014 #27
There are no serious racial issues in America JustAnotherGen Nov 2014 #24
"Racial"? Wasn't she a character on "Friends"? WinkyDink Nov 2014 #28
Bullshit. It was a bizarre, unprecedented grand jury proceeding and expert after expert merrily Nov 2014 #17
It worked for whom? The white establishment. nt TBF Nov 2014 #21
You have no idea how a grand jury is supposed to work, HERVEPA Nov 2014 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #17