Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 09:50 PM Nov 2014

Sexism, intellectual laziness, giddy gah gah, and sweetheart [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Electric Larry (a host of the General Discussion forum).

Many responses to my "Women are Sexist Pigs" thread from the other night fall under intellectual laziness. It's pretty clear that I understand the historical context, loyalsister. That you missed it is just lazy. People came to that thread with pre-fab responses. Minds already made up and loaded for bear.

So many of the intellectually lazy, loyalsister, got stuck on, "giddy gah gah" and "swooning". None of you cared about what one of the women said about the way they behaved, i.e., the gah gah.

I left soon after and almost immediately received a text from D who said she was sorry she made me feel uncomfortable and it was totally hypocritical of her and she won't do it again. She went on and said I was totally right, if it was reversed (5 men talking about a hot female coworker), each one of them would be freaking out.

So, based on her words, it was a big deal from the point of view of a woman.

Not a hostile environment. I couldn't wait for them to slip up! We are a tight group. They love me and I them. But because of the historical context, I have to be careful, moreso than them. You should have noticed, loyalsister. Lazy...

re: sweetheart
I was explaining this when I got locked out of the thread so it never got posted. "Sweetheart" is kind of a big deal in my field. The women work with older men who call them "Sweetheart" and "Sweetie". My coworkers are to correct them each time, saying something like, "My name is Kathleen, please address me by my name."

Other words on the no-no list:

Crazy: I can't believe that. That's totally crazy. (FAIL)
Nuts: You cannot be serious. That guy drives me nuts! (FAIL)

Sweetheart isn't really part of my vernacular, but I've been saying "crazy" and "nuts" for longer than they've been alive.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
meh...FWIW, some context WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2014 #1
There's a big difference between calling someone "Sweetheart" and "a sweetheart" cyberswede Nov 2014 #2
I didn't see that. And I indeed said "a sweetheart" WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2014 #5
So, this is in fact a callout thread. Sheldon Cooper Nov 2014 #3
What are the rules about that on DU? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #4
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #7
The rules are enforced by the DU mob WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2014 #9
If loyalsister used a less offensive (?) word... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2014 #6
upshot: don't quote someone and use their words against them WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2014 #8
This is a shitty call out. You should delete it. n/t tammywammy Nov 2014 #10
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #11
It's nice that you're getting to use your new phrase. tammywammy Nov 2014 #13
FAIL. it is a big fucking deal. I'll prove it here in time WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2014 #14
loyalsister probably agrees with me on that WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2014 #12
Locking Warren DeMontague Nov 2014 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sexism, intellectual lazi...