Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,847 posts)
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 11:07 AM Dec 2014

RWNJs _K N O W_ they were wrong on Fergusen so they're using Staten Island for cover. [View all]

I honestly think a lot of them were shocked at the blowback they got when they naturally sided with Darren Wilson. Usually they can do that with impunity and it surprised them. So they doubled down, got louder, and generally looked like even bigger, less rational assholes than normal (see Joe Scarborough's rant as exhibit A: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/scarborough-rants-against-rams-dems-for-hands-up-gesture-you-know-its-a-lie/), going so far as to rail against the Rams players' rights to express an opposing view.

But Garner in Staten Island? Virtually to the last bloviating RW commentator they're saying it's a miscarriage of justice. They're bending over backward to look reasonable. This is not evidence of evolving sensitivity, this is making a deposit on cover for the next time they express their true opinion on the inevitable next cop-executes-black person event.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They are only fooling OTHER corpmedia with their ACT. blm Dec 2014 #1
Alternatively, it is actually possible that people can look at the two events mythology Dec 2014 #2
I don't understand how taxes are impacted here, Garner paid for those cigarettes taxes and all hollysmom Dec 2014 #3
Yes, and it's those superficially different circumstances that allow them to rationalize not taking Gidney N Cloyd Dec 2014 #4
BINGO! blm Dec 2014 #11
Someone that doesn't have a one track mind! I am one that has that doc03 Dec 2014 #5
In Ferguson case the Prosecutor's office presented a long-overturned law blm Dec 2014 #7
For Garner there is video footage of the whole incident. Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #6
What did the majority of witnesses say? blm Dec 2014 #8
Here you go: Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #9
So, you don't believe the majority or you DO believe the majority? blm Dec 2014 #10
How can anyone know what to believe? Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #12
That wound would be consistent with reports of Wilson shooting at Brown when blm Dec 2014 #13
the conflicting testimony merited a trial frylock Dec 2014 #14
Do you think there would be any chance of a jury finding Wilson guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #15
no i can't, but are we to just throw up our hands and say fuck it? frylock Dec 2014 #16
If he is tried and acquitted now (which he would be) it's done, over with, Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #17
So, based on that view, there should be far, far fewer court trials. blm Dec 2014 #18
Nope (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RWNJs _K N O W_ they were...